Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046524›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Sihua Wen, Xiaofei Zhang, Yanan Wu, Shangshang Yu, Wei Zhang, Ding Liu, Kai Yang, Jing Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Multi-target protective effects ofPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Alphitolic Acid Isolated fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sihua WenSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Xiaofei ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Yanan WuSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Shangshang YuSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Ding LiuSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Kai YangSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Jing SunSchool of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Aim of the review: We summarize the traditional uses, botanical and chemical composition, extraction methods, and pharmacological and toxicological progress of Materials and methods: Information on Results: Phytochemical studies have identified more than 252 compounds from Conclusion: This review highlights the botany, phytochemistry, pharmacology, toxicology, and traditional uses of

Indexed as

Agrimonia pilosa LedebBotanyChemical compositionPharmacological effectsTraditional uses

Identifiers

PMID36046524
PMCPMC9421327
OpenAlexW4286267993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.