Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046517›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2021

Patient-specific virtual reality technology for complex neurosurgical cases: illustrative cases.

Diana Anthony, Robert G Louis, Yevgenia Shekhtman, Thomas Steineke, Anthony Frempong-Boadu, Gary K Steinberg

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NurseVerse: nursing in the metaverse era.Frontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Surgical planning in virtual reality: a systematic review.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Diana AnthonyDepartment of Neurosurgery and Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Robert G LouisPickup Family Neuroscience Institute, Hoag Memorial Hospital Newport Beach, Newport Beach, California.
Yevgenia ShekhtmanNeuroscience Institute, Hackensack Meridian JFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey; and.
Thomas SteinekeNeuroscience Institute, Hackensack Meridian JFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey; and.
Anthony Frempong-BoaduDepartment of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Gary K SteinbergDepartment of Neurosurgery and Stanford Stroke Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) offers an interactive environment for visualizing the intimate three-dimensional (3D) relationship between a patient's pathology and surrounding anatomy. The authors present a model for using personalized VR technology, applied across the neurosurgical treatment continuum from the initial consultation to preoperative surgical planning, then to intraoperative navigation, and finally to postoperative visits, for various tumor and vascular pathologies. OBSERVATIONS: Five adult patients undergoing procedures for spinal cord cavernoma, clinoidal meningioma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma, giant aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation were included. For each case, 360-degree VR (360°VR) environments developed using Surgical Theater were used for patient consultation, preoperative planning, and/or intraoperative 3D navigation. The custom 360°VR model was rendered from the patient's preoperative imaging. For two cases, the plan changed after reviewing the patient's 360°VR model from one based on conventional Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine imaging. LESSONS: Live 360° visualization with Surgical Theater in conjunction with surgical navigation helped validate the decisions made intraoperatively. The 360°VR models provided visualization to better understand the lesion's 3D anatomy, as well as to plan and execute the safest patient-specific approach, rather than a less detailed, more standardized one. In all cases, preoperative planning using the patient's 360°VR model had a significant impact on the surgical approach.

Indexed as

360°VR = 360-degree virtual reality3D = three dimensional3D visualizationAVM = arteriovenous malformationCTA = computed tomography angiographyCT = computed tomographyDICOM = Digital Imaging and Communications in MedicineDSA = digital subtraction angiographyDTI = diffusion tensor imagingfMRI = functional magnetic resonance imagingMCA = middle cerebral arteryMRI = magnetic resonance imagingOR = operating roompatient educationpersonalized medicineSNAP = Surgical Navigation Advanced PlatformSRP = Surgical Rehearsal PlatformSTA = superficial temporal arterysurgical navigationsurgical planningvirtual realityVR = virtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36046517
PMCPMC9394696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.