Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046349›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians2022

Medication Use Among Patients Reporting Xerostomia of an Academic Dental Clinic.

Michael P Krajewski, QingXiang Mo, Chi-Hua Lu, Albert Cantos, Steve Feuerstein, Michael J Brandt, Robert G Wahler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael P KrajewskiSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8079-2180
QingXiang MoSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Chi-Hua LuSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9647-4363
Albert CantosSchool of Dental Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Steve FeuersteinSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Michael J BrandtDepartment of Psychology, Tiffin University, Tiffin, OH, USA.
Robert G WahlerSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0593-3195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Global prevalence of xerostomia has been reported at 22% (range 0.01%-45%), negatively impacting oral health, nutrition intake, and quality of life. The causal relationship between xerostomia and medications remains uncertain but greater understanding could guide interventions. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics and medication regimens in patients with xerostomia of an academic dental clinic. Method: This is a retrospective academic dental clinic record review from July 1, 2018 to October 27, 2020. Patient records were obtained from the University at Buffalo, School of Dental Medicine. Xerostomia status was determined via query of electronic health records and validated by manual review. Pharmacologic class and xerostomic potential of medications were identified by the Veterans Affairs Drug Classification System and drug compendia, respectively. Predictors of medication use were assessed using a multiple logistic regression model. Results: Of 37 403 examined records, 366 (0.98%) were identified as xerostomic. After excluding confounding factors (Sjogren's and radiation), 275 of 317 patients received at least one xerostomic medication, majority were female (240, 66%) versus male (126, 34%). Mean ± (SD) age was 64.9 ± 15.11 years. A total of 208 (57%) patients were aged ≥65. The median number of total and xerostomic medications were 8 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-12) and 4 (IQR, 2-7), respectively. The 3 most prevalent xerostomic pharmacologic classes were antidepressants (131, 35%), gastric medications (101, 28%), and vitamin D (87, 24%). Conclusion: Despite observed prevalence of xerostomia lower than global prevalence, xerostomic medication burden for patients experiencing xerostomia was high. Pharmacist-led interprofessional collaborations should be investigated to reduce xerostomic burden.

Indexed as

aginggeriatric dentistryhealth careoral healthquality assurancexerostomia

Identifiers

PMID36046349
PMCPMC9420921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.