ArticleCureus2022
Evaluation of a Novel Cardiology Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Cardiology is a complex discipline that requires mastery of key principles and the ability to apply them in varied clinical scenarios, which may be challenging to teach in the traditional lecture-based format. The purpose of this educational intervention was to evaluate the effect of a flipped classroom model on knowledge base and attitudes towards high-yield cardiology concepts in third and fourth-year medical students at our institution. Methods An invitation to this optional course was sent to third and fourth-year medical students at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Interested students were sent a document providing optional pre-course self-directed educational materials designed to take one hour to review. The materials included videos, graphics, and short sections of articles related to heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and tachyarrhythmias (TA). Students were then scheduled for a thirty-minute small-group session with a clinician, during which they reviewed the diagnosis and management of HF, ACS, and TA on an online video conference platform. Anonymous pre- and post-course assessments to measure knowledge and confidence were collected. Results Twenty-one students completed the pre-course assessment, and 19 students completed the post-course assessment. Seventy-nine percent of the students reported completion of at least half of the self-directed pre-work. The average score on the knowledge assessment rose from 42% to 71% after the course (p<0.001). After the course, 18 (95%) felt comfortable contributing to the management of a case of HF, 16 (84%) a case of ACS, and 13 (68%) a case of TA. Conclusion Knowledge assessment scores and learner self-confidence with the management of HF, ACS, and TA rose significantly after undergraduate medical education students completed this flipped classroom training. This exploratory study showed that the flipped classroom model with small group sessions can be a well-received model for medical student cardiology education among a self-motivated group of learners, though further analysis with a larger learner cohort is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.