ReviewFrontiers in surgery2022
High flow nasal cannula for patients undergoing bronchoscopy and gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A meta-analysis of the effects of transnasal high-flow oxygen therapy in gastrointestinal endoscopy.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- A comparative study of conventional, High-flow, and jet ventilation via the Wei nasal jet tube for oxygen therapy in patients undergoing bronchoscopic intervention under deep sedation: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Procedural Oxygen Mask Versus Conventional Nasal Cannula for Hypoxemia Prevention During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Trial
- Ultrasonography and a novel combined prediction model for anticipating hypoxemia during painless gastroscopy.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of nasal high-flow therapy versus standard oxygen therapy in hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTS.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: From Drug-Centered Protocols to Personalized, Technology-Supported Pathways: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- New Trends in Airway Management During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Respiratory Depression in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia: An Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Resources in the bronchoscopy suite and the utility of cryobiopsy.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Sedation for GI Endoscopy in the Morbidly Obese: Challenges and Possible Solutions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- High-flow nasal cannula use in pediatric patients for other indications than acute bronchiolitis-a scoping review of randomized controlled trials.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- High flow oxygen therapy versus conventional oxygen therapy in dogs and cats undergoing bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage: a pilot study.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Personalized Noninvasive Respiratory Support in the Perioperative Setting: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Comparative efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula versus conventional oxygen delivery during procedural sedation for ovum pickup in assisted reproductive technology.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High flow nasal cannula is gaining increasingly used in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. We undertook this systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) could effectively minimize the risk of hypoxemia as compared with conventional oxygen therapy (COT). Methods: We performed a comprehensive search of Pubmed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and Web of Science. Studies involving the application of HFNC during endoscopic procedures were identified. Results: We included 15 randomized controlled trials (7 bronchoscopy, 8 gastrointestinal endoscopy). Patients receiving HFNC during endoscopic procedures had a significantly lower risk of hypoxemia (defined as SpO Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis found moderate to low evidence that the application of HFNC was associated with improved oxygenation, decreased need for airway intervention, and reduced procedure interruption in patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Future larger sample and high-quality studies are warranted to confirm our result and further investigate the effectiveness of HFNC in patients at risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.