ReviewJPRAS open2022
Cemiplimab and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Bench to Bedside.
Review in JPRAS open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-coding RNAs in programmed cell death regulation in melanoma: mechanisms and therapeutic insights.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Identification of prognostic liquid biopsy biomarkers in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: a narrative review.Translational cancer research · 2024Review
- Article
- A Retrospective Study of Cemiplimab Effectiveness in Elderly Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: Insights from a Real-Life Scenario.Oncology and therapy · 2024Article
- Exploring potential roles of long non-coding RNAs in cancer immunotherapy: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Supraorbital Basosquamous Carcinoma Treated with Cemiplimab Followed by Sonidegib: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- IL-6 as new prognostic factor in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation and its repercussions in patients with melanoma refractory to anti-PD-1 therapy: scope review.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are the most common cancer in fair-skinned individuals with basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) being the most common subtype. While BCC has historically been the most common NMSC, SCC is increasing in incidence relative to BCC. SCC has a very poor prognosis with advanced local infiltration or when it achieves a metastatic state with around 50% of patients with locally advanced disease relapsing with an average overall survival of 10-13 months for patients with recurrent or metastatic disease. The pathogenesis of cutaneous SCC (cSCC) is multifactorial, and many studies have also described in detail the strong link between tumour apoptosis, DNA repair mechanism deficiencies, and developing cSCC. Patients with TP53 mutations are more susceptible to develop cSCC, thus highlighting the importance of cell cycle regulation and also pointing towards the potential therapeutic targets within. This review illustrates the role of the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor cemiplimab in treating advanced and metastatic cSCC not suitable to surgical excision and describes its development in the context of the translational research paradigm from preclinical studies to its licenced implementation in clinical care and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.