ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2022
Color difference between the vita classical shade guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of low-concentration whitestrips for extrinsic tooth discoloration: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Trial
- Modulating the Optical Properties of Initial Caries Lesions Through Low-Viscosity Resin Infiltration: A Spectrophotometric Evaluation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Masking ability of layering techniques combined with white or yellow opaquers on a dark background.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2026Review
- Assessment of toothbrushing, bleaching pen and bleaching mouthwash in removing stains from tooth structure and single-shade resin composite.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Color stability of CAD/CAM provisional materials after immersion in different coloring solutions: a comparative study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Pilot Study of the Shade Matching of Biomimetic Composite Resins in Posterior Dental Restorations: Randomised Clinical Trial.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Color Masking Ability of Guided Enamel Regeneration with a Novel Self-Assembling Peptide and Resin Infiltration on Artificial Enamel Lesions Under Various Challenges: An In Vitro Spectrophotometric Analysis.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Degree of Standardisation in Ceramic Gingival Systems.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparison of Composite Resin (Duo-Shade) Shade Guide with Vita Ceramic Shades Before and After Chemical and Autoclave Sterilization.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color difference between the Vita Classical Shade Guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique. Material and Methods: Thirty samples were fabricated using a custom-made mold (Easy Layering Shade Guide Kit, 3M) using two resin composites: Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M); and Estelite Omega (Tokuyama) (n=3). The composite veneers were made by layering the different enamel and body or dentin shades from each composite. The color measurements were taken using a spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade V®, Vita Zahnfabrik). The ΔE00 between the Vita Classical Shade Guide (Vita Zahnfabrik) and the composite veneers were calculated using the CIEDE2000 formula. Results: For the composite veneers using Filtek Supreme Ultra, the best match for A1 Vita shade was achieved layering either EA1 with DA2 or DA3; EA2 with DA1 or DA2 (ΔE00= 1.53 ~ 1.96 ± 0.4). For A2 Vita shade the best match would be EA3 with DA3 or EA3 with DA2 (ΔE00= 1.40 ~ 1.85 ± 0.1); or for A3 Vita shade the best match would be EA3 with DA2 2.50±(0.6). For the composite veneers using Estelite Omega, the were no best match for neither A1, A2 or A3 Vita shade (ΔE00> 2.5). Conclusions: The combination of enamel and dentin shades from Filtek Supreme Ultra provided acceptable color match for A1, A2 and A3 shades from the Vita Shade Guide, while Estelite Omega did not provide acceptable color match for any of the Vita Shade Guide standard shades tested.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.