Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046152›Full record

ArticleSynthetic biology (Oxford, England)2022

Effects of DNA template preparation on variability in cell-free protein production.

Eugenia Romantseva, Nina Alperovich, David Ross, Steven P Lund, Elizabeth A Strychalski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Synthetic biology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Special issue: reproducibility in synthetic biology.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eugenia RomantsevaNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-7966
Nina AlperovichNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
David RossNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-218X
Steven P LundNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
Elizabeth A StrychalskiNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD USA.
National Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA templates for protein production remain an unexplored source of variability in the performance of cell-free expression (CFE) systems. To characterize this variability, we investigated the effects of two common DNA extraction methodologies, a postprocessing step and manual versus automated preparation on protein production using CFE. We assess the concentration of the DNA template, the quality of the DNA template in terms of physical damage and the quality of the DNA solution in terms of purity resulting from eight DNA preparation workflows. We measure the variance in protein titer and rate of protein production in CFE reactions associated with the biological replicate of the DNA template, the technical replicate DNA solution prepared with the same workflow and the measurement replicate of nominally identical CFE reactions. We offer practical guidance for preparing and characterizing DNA templates to achieve acceptable variability in CFE performance.

Indexed as

automationcell-free expressioncell-free protein productionCFEDNA templatereproducibilityTX-TLvariability

Identifiers

PMID36046152
PMCPMC9425043
OpenAlexW4291115901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.