Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2022

Characterization of volatile constituents and odorous compounds in peach (

Ping Sun, Bing Xu, Yi Wang, Xianrui Lin, Chenfei Chen, Jianxi Zhu, Huijuan Jia, Xinwei Wang, Jiansheng Shen, Tao Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of the volatile organic compounds inFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ping SunJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Bing XuJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Yi WangJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Xianrui LinJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Chenfei ChenJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Jianxi ZhuJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Huijuan JiaThe College of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xinwei WangZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiansheng ShenJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Tao FengJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Institute of Agricultural Machinery), Jinhua, China.
Shanghai Institute of Technology · CNJinhua Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNZhejiang University · CNZhengzhou Fruit Research Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to acquire information for future breeding efforts aimed at improving fruit quality

Indexed as

gas chromatography–ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS)gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS)odorous compoundspeachrelative odor activity value (ROAV)

Identifiers

PMID36046134
PMCPMC9421302
OpenAlexW4291465176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.