ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2022
Biologic Disease-Modifying and Other Anti-Rheumatic Drugs Use in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Based on a Japanese Nationwide Claims Database.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uptake and Use of Biologic Therapies in Paediatric Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: An Australian Population-Based Study.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- A decade of progress in juvenile idiopathic arthritis treatments and outcomes in Canada: results from ReACCh-Out and the CAPRI registry.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are highly effective and safe against juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), which is classified into systemic JIA (sJIA) and the other JIA categories (non-sJIA) according to differences in clinical symptoms and pathophysiology. The purpose of the current study was to investigate trends in patterns of prescribing bDMARDs for moderate-to-severe JIA using a relatively large sample size in Japan. Patients and Methods: A descriptive epidemiological study based on a nationwide claims database in Japan was conducted from 2012 to 2018 using the "JMDC Claims Database" to explain annual changes based on the number of patients prescribed bDMARDs. Study drugs were identified based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical codes, such as methotrexate, glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and bDMARDs. Results: From a database of 6,862,244 patients, the following exclusion criteria were applied: aged ≥16 years, without "M08" in their ICD-10 code as disease, and missing the information of prescription date in the database during the study period, resulting in a final number of 111 JIA patients. We found an increasing trend for adalimumab and tocilizumab and a decreasing trend for methotrexate. Differences in medication use between sJIA and non-sJIA patients were also evident, being consistent with national and international guidelines. Conclusion: Although the introduction of bDMARDs has markedly improved the efficacy of JIA therapy, there are still many short- and long-term safety issues to be examined, including the risk of infection and potential risk of associated malignancy. Future studies are needed to clarify these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.