Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046091›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2022

A preliminary exploration of the impact of experiential learning on animal science undergraduates' perceptions of humane stunning and slaughter.

Paxton Sullivan, Melissa Davis, Colton L Smith, Robert Delmore, Noa Román-Muñiz, Catie Cramer, Lorann Stallones, Lily Edwards-Callaway

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Paxton SullivanDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Melissa DavisDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Colton L SmithDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Robert DelmoreDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Noa Román-MuñizDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Catie CramerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6391-2387
Lorann StallonesDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Lily Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0737-9899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential to educate students about humane slaughter as it is a critical component of livestock production, particularly for animal science students who represent future stakeholders in agriculture. There is limited research about the effects of experiential learning on student comfort in participating in education regarding sensitive, yet important topics in the animal sciences. A survey was developed to investigate how a teaching module using an experiential learning activity to teach undergraduates about the slaughter process affected student perceptions of stunning and slaughter. Students enrolled in an animal science course, in which live animals and carcasses are evaluated, were surveyed before and after a teaching module. The module included a lecture about proper stunning and a laboratory activity in which the students had the opportunity to shoot a captive bolt stunner on both model and carcass heads. Respondents completed a pre-survey, attended the laboratory activity, and completed a post-survey; 29 survey responses were recorded. Most respondents were women (23, 79.3%) between the ages of 18 and 21 years (25, 86.2%) and in their first year of college (11, 37.9%). The majority of respondents (22, 75.9%) reported using the captive bolt stunner to stun the model heads during the laboratory activity. After participating in the module, all students strongly agreed that "stunning" is a critical component of livestock slaughter (29, 100%) and most agreed that "stunning is a humane process that ensures animal welfare during the slaughter process" (25, 86.2%). The majority of respondents strongly agreed that the "humane stunning simulation was beneficial to their learning about livestock slaughter" (21, 72.4%) and "improved their understanding of slaughter" (16, 55.2%). Almost all of the survey respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that "the model heads and captive bolt demonstration made them more comfortable with the slaughter process" (14, 48.3%; 14, 48.3%, respectively). This research suggests that experiential learning opportunities are potentially effective teaching strategies for educating undergraduates about the slaughter process. Future research should focus on practical ways to integrate new teaching methods into existing animal science curricula, as this will be critical for educating students on important topics in livestock production and increasing student comfort with sensitive material.

Indexed as

animal scienceeducationexperiential learningslaughterstunningundergraduate

Identifiers

PMID36046091
PMCPMC9423032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.