Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046065›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2022

Strengths and vulnerabilities: Comparing post-9/11 U.S. veterans' and non-veterans' perceptions of health and broader well-being.

Dawne Vogt, Shelby Borowski, Shira Maguen, John R Blosnich, Claire A Hoffmire, Paul A Bernhard, Katherine M Iverson, Aaron Schneiderman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spirituality is associated with psychological hardiness in U.S. army soldiers and civilians.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dawne VogtWomen's Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Shelby BorowskiWomen's Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Shira MaguenDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
John R BlosnichSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Claire A HoffmireRocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Aurora, CO, USA.
Paul A BernhardEpidemiology Program, Health Outcomes of Military Exposures, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
Katherine M IversonWomen's Health Sciences Division, National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Aaron SchneidermanEpidemiology Program, Health Outcomes of Military Exposures, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA.
Boston University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prior research has examined how the post-military health and well-being of both the larger veteran population and earlier veteran cohorts differs from non-veterans. However, no study has yet to provide a holistic examination of how the health, vocational, financial, and social well-being of the newest generation of post-9/11 U.S. military veterans compares with their non-veteran peers. This is a significant oversight, as accurate knowledge of the strengths and vulnerabilities of post-9/11 veterans is required to ensure that the needs of this population are adequately addressed, as well as to counter inaccurate veteran stereotypes. Methods: Post-9/11 U.S. veterans' (N = 15,160) and non-veterans' (N = 4,533) reported on their health and broader well-being as part of a confidential web-based survey in 2018. Participants were drawn from probability-based sampling frames, and sex-stratified weighted logistic regressions were conducted to examine differences in veterans' and non-veterans' reports of health, vocational, financial, and social outcomes. Results: Although both men and women post-9/11 veterans endorsed poorer health status than non-veterans, they reported greater engagement in a number of positive health behaviors (healthy eating and exercise) and were more likely to indicate having access to health care. Veterans also endorsed greater social well-being than non-veterans on several outcomes, whereas few differences were observed in vocational and financial well-being. Conclusion: Despite their greater vulnerability to experiencing health conditions, the newest generation of post-9/11 U.S. veterans report experiencing similar or better outcomes than non-veterans in many aspects of their lives. Findings underscore the value of examining a wider range of health and well-being outcomes in veteran research and highlight a number of important directions for intervention, public health education, policy, and research related to the reintegration of military veterans within broader civilian society.

Indexed as

EmploymentFinancesHealth and health behaviorMilitary servicePost-9/11 veteransSocial relationshipsSurveyWell-being

Identifiers

PMID36046065
PMCPMC9421326
OpenAlexW4293224927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.