Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Development of an ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram to preoperatively predict Ki-67 expression level in patients with breast cancer.

Jinjin Liu, Xuchao Wang, Mengshang Hu, Yan Zheng, Lin Zhu, Wei Wang, Jisu Hu, Zhiyong Zhou, Yakang Dai, Fenglin Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application and prospects of AI-based radiomics in ultrasound diagnosis.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jinjin LiuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Xuchao WangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, China.
Mengshang HuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yan ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lin ZhuDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jisu HuSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Zhiyong ZhouSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Yakang DaiSuzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China.
Fenglin DongDepartment of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a radiomics nomogram that could incorporate clinicopathological characteristics and ultrasound (US)-based radiomics signature to non-invasively predict Ki-67 expression level in patients with breast cancer (BC) preoperatively. Methods: A total of 328 breast lesions from 324 patients with BC who were pathologically confirmed in our hospital from June 2019 to October 2020 were included, and they were divided into high Ki-67 expression level group and low Ki-67 expression level group. Routine US and shear wave elastography (SWE) were performed for each lesion, and the ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) were scanned for abnormal changes. The datasets were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts with a ratio of 7:3. Correlation analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were used to select the radiomics features obtained from gray-scale US images of BC patients, and each radiomics score (Rad-score) was calculated. Afterwards, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to establish a radiomics nomogram based on the radiomics signature and clinicopathological characteristics. The prediction performance of the nomogram was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) using the results of immunohistochemistry as the gold standard. Results: The radiomics signature, consisted of eight selected radiomics features, achieved a nearly moderate prediction efficacy with AUC of 0.821 (95% CI:0.764-0.880) and 0.713 (95% CI:0.612-0.814) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The radiomics nomogram, incorporating maximum diameter of lesions, stiff rim sign, US-reported ALN status, and radiomics signature showed a promising performance for prediction of Ki-67 expression level, with AUC of 0.904 (95% CI:0.860-0.948) and 0.890 (95% CI:0.817-0.964) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA indicated promising consistency and clinical applicability. Conclusion: The proposed US-based radiomics nomogram could be used to non-invasively predict Ki-67 expression level in BC patients preoperatively, and to assist clinicians in making reliable clinical decisions.

Indexed as

breast neoplasmsKi-67 expressionradiomics nomogramshear wave elastography (SWE)ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36046035
PMCPMC9421073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.