ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Prediction and Estimation of River Velocity Based on GAN and Multifeature Fusion.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven predictions of geophysical river flows with vegetation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The necessity of predicting and estimating river velocity motivates the development of a prediction method based on GAN image enhancement and multifeature fusion. In this method, in order to improve the image quality of river velocity, GAN network is used to enhance the image, so as to improve the integrity of image data set. In order to improve the accuracy of prediction, the image is extracted and fused with multiple features, and the extracted multiple features are taken as the input of CNN, so as to improve the prediction accuracy of convolution neural network. The results show that when the velocity is 0.25 m/s, 0.50 m/s, and 0.75 m/s, the accuracy of improved method can reach 85%, 90%, and 92%, which are higher than SVM, VGG-16, and BPNET algorithms. The above results indicate that the improvement has certain positive value and practical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.