Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045901›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nephrology2022

Time on Therapy of Automated Peritoneal Dialysis with and without Remote Patient Monitoring: A Cohort Study.

Mauricio Sanabria, Jasmin Vesga, Bengt Lindholm, Angela Rivera, Peter Rutherford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of Remote and Virtual Technology on Home Dialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mauricio SanabriaBaxter Renal Care Services-Latin America, Bogotá, DC, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-9832
Jasmin VesgaBaxter Renal Care Services Colombia, Bucaramanga, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8111-6395
Bengt LindholmRenal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4269-4293
Angela RiveraBaxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2162-7131
Peter RutherfordBaxter Healthcare Corporation, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2425-4358
Baxter (United States) · USBaxter (Colombia) · COBaxter (Switzerland) · CHKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Remote patient monitoring (RPM) of patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis (APD-RPM) may potentially enhance time on therapy due to possible improvements in technique and patient survival. Objective: To evaluate the effect of APD-RPM as compared to APD without RPM on time on therapy. Methods: Adult incident APD patients undergo APD for 90 days or more in the Baxter Renal Care Services (BRCS) Colombia network between January 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019, with the study follow-up ending June 30, 2021. The exposure variable was APD-RPM vs. APD-without RPM. The outcomes of time on therapy and mortality rate over two years of follow-up were estimated in the full sample and in a matched population according to the exposure variable. A propensity score matching (PSM) 1:1 without replacement utilizing the nearest neighbor within caliper (0.035) was used and created a pseudopopulation in which the baseline covariates were well balanced. Fine & Gray multivariate analysis was performed to assess the effect of demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables on the risk of death, adjusting for the competing risks of technique failure and kidney transplantation. Results: In the matched sample, the time on APD therapy was significantly longer in the RPM group than in the non-RPM group, 18.95 vs. 15.75 months, Conclusion: Over two years of follow-up, the use of RPM vs. no RPM in APD patients was associated with a significant increase in time on therapy, by 3.2 months. This result indicates that RPM-supported APD therapy may improve the clinical effectiveness and the overall quality of APD.

Identifiers

PMID36045901
PMCPMC9424000
OpenAlexW4292674067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.