Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045781›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

Evidence-based airway management protocol for a critical ill patient in medical intensive care unit: Systematic review.

Biruk Adie Admass, Nigussie Simeneh Endalew, Hailu Yimer Tawye, Debas Yaregal Melesse, Misganaw Mengie Workie, Tesera Dereje Filatie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06344949 (Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Tracheal Intubation in ICU Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06344949 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Tracheal Intubation in ICU Patients: a Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Zhongshan HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsEmergency Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill PatientsArmsCiprofol, Propofol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Validity of MACOCHA Score in Predicting First-pass Success of Endotracheal Intubation in Emergency Department: An Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Biruk Adie AdmassDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Nigussie Simeneh EndalewDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Hailu Yimer TawyeDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Debas Yaregal MelesseDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Misganaw Mengie WorkieDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tesera Dereje FilatieDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
University of Gondar · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Airway management outside the theatre is performed either to resuscitate a physiologically unstable critically ill patients or to secure an emergency airway in the absence of essential equipments. It is a life saving procedure for critically ill and injured patients. Delaying in securing airway or awaking the patient is not an option in case of difficult airway in intensive care unit. Therefore, developing and implementation of an evidence-based airway management protocol is important. Objective: This review was conducted to develop a clear airway management protocol for a critical ill patient in medical intensive care unit. Methods: After formulating the key questions, scope, and eligibility criteria for the evidences to be included, a comprehensive search strategy of electronic sources was conducted. The literatures were searched using advanced searching methods from data bases and websites to get evidences on airway management of a critical ill patient. Duplication of literatures was avoided by endnote. Screening of literatures was conducted based on the level of significance with proper appraisal. This review was carried out in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. Results: A total of 626 articles were identified from data bases and websites using an electronic search. Of these articles, 95 were removed for duplication and 305 studies were excluded after reviewing their titles and abstracts. At the screening stage, 79 articles were retrieved and evaluated for the eligibility. Finally, 40 studies related to airway management of a critical ill patient in medical ICU were included in this systematic review Conclusion: A critical ill patient needs oxygenation and ventilation support. A focused and rapid assessment, with special attention of the airway and hemodynamic status of the critical ill patient is paramount. An appropriate airway management option should be employed to resuscitate or to control an emergency airway of a critical ill patent. This could be non invasive ventilation or invasive airway intervention.

Indexed as

Airway managementCritical illIntensive careOxygenationVentilation

Identifiers

PMID36045781
PMCPMC9422313
OpenAlexW4289838613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.