Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045769›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

The practice of blood cross-match request and transfusion in surgical patients at Debre Markos comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Debre Markos, Ethiopia, 2021/2022. A prospective study.

Abebaw Misganaw, Getamesay Demelash Simegn, Samuel Debas Bayable, Agmuas Aschale, Amare Anilay Beyable, Yitayal Guadie Ashebir, Lamesgen Geta Abate

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abebaw MisganawDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Getamesay Demelash SimegnDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Samuel Debas BayableDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Agmuas AschaleDepartment of Anesthesia, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Debre Berhan Univesity, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia.
Amare Anilay BeyableDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Yitayal Guadie AshebirDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Lamesgen Geta AbateDepartment of Anesthesia, School of Medicine, Debre Markos Univesity, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Debre Markos University · ETDebre Berhan University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Blood transfusions play a great role to improve oxygen delivery to tissues for indicated surgical patients. Preoperative ordering of blood, especially in elective surgery, is often based on the worst-case assumptions, demanding large quantities of blood or overestimating the anticipated blood loss, of which little is ultimately used. This study aimed to assess the practices of blood requisite and transfusion in surgical patients. Method: An institutional-based prospective study was conducted from September to February 2021/2022, in Debre Markos comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Socio-demographic data like age, sex, ASA status, type of anesthesia, and type of surgeries were taken preoperatively. The number of cross-matched and transfused data were collected from patient charts throughout the perioperative periods. Efficacy of blood utilization was evaluated using the following indices like cross-match to transfusion ratio (C/T ratio), transfusion probability (%T), and transfusion index (TI); a ratio of 2.5 and below, A value of 30% and above, and values of 0.5 or more respectively were considered indicative of significant blood usage and this study is registered with a research unique identifying number of researchregistry7989 and reported in line with STROCSS 2021 guideline. Result: In all procedures, among cross-matched blood units 64.1% were unutilized. Depending on the urgency of the procedures about 77.7% of cross-matched blood units were not utilized in elective patients. In emergency procedures, the majority (64.3%) of cross-matched units were transfused. The overall blood transfusion indices result was C/T ratio, %T, and TI was 2.9, 33.5%, and 0.7, respectively. The overall blood transfusion indices for elective and emergency surgery are set respectively as follows C/T ratio (4.6 vs 1.5), %T (22 vs 78.8), and TI (0.4 vs 1.9). Among elective procedures, blood utilization was significant in orthopedic surgery with the value of C/T ratio 1.3, %T 66, and TI 1.4. In the rest of the elective procedures, blood transfusion indices were not significant. Conclusion: The overall blood utilization indices in emergency surgical patients were better than in elective and preoperative grouping, screening, and hold (GSH) is sufficient for elective surgical procedures to decrease wastage of valuable supplies.

Indexed as

Blood transfusionBlood transfusion practiceMaximum surgical ordering schedule

Identifiers

PMID36045769
PMCPMC9422072
OpenAlexW4290614459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.