ArticleJournal of eating disorders2022
Users' perceptions of how an unmoderated eating disorder community may benefit or harm their recovery.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the negative and positive outcomes of pro-eating disorder groups have been well-documented, more research is needed on the effects of pro-recovery communities. In particular, a gap in knowledge remains surrounding users' feelings about their experiences in such communities. Using open-ended questions, we surveyed those involved in the recovery community on the social media site Tumblr, to determine how the community helped/did not help with recovery, and how it made them feel about recovery.
methodsParticipants (n = 29) answered a series of Likert and open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were examined using thematic analysis to learn about users' lived experiences.
resultsThemes identified included connection/acceptance, motivation/encouragement, content, and competition/comparisons. Participants overall felt that the community helped them feel connected to others and accepted for their struggles and their successes, though a minority did note that such acceptance could sometimes reinforce negative behaviors, and connection could lead to pressure to help others. Participants found both direct advice and indirect support (e.g., encouraging posts) to be motivating for their recovery. Feelings of competition and comparison were mixed; some felt that comparing to others made them feel less than, while others used such comparisons as reminders to stay strong in recovery. Participants indicated that the content within the community varies; sometimes there is a large presence of pro eating disorder posts, while at other times, posts are more positive, motivational, and encouraging.
conclusionsParticipants overall indicated that the community had many helpful aspects and made them feel better about recovery. However, the presence of triggering content and competition in particular were notable drawbacks of the community. Overall, recovery communities on unmoderated sites or social media applications may be useful tools during the recovery process, despite some important limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.