ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2022
Tailor-made natural and synthetic grafts for precise urethral reconstruction.
Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Constructing a biomimetic ECM protective barrier: a strategic interface design for urethral repair to mitigate foreign body reaction.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Dynamic microenvironment-regulated hydrogels releasing celastrol lead to urethral scarless repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Association of systemic immune-inflammatory index with stress urinary incontinence in U.S. Adults: NHANES 2007-2016.PloS one · 2026Article
- Construction of a Bioactive ECM Interface Enables Concurrent Suppression of Foreign Body Reaction, Inflammation, and Promotion of Urethral Regeneration.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Precision theranostics in cervical Cancer: Harnessing stimuli-responsive hydrogels for tumor microenvironment-targeted therapy and diagnosis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Application of decellularized tilapia skin in rabbit urethral reconstruction: an experimental study.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- 3D-bioprinted urethral grafts: Revolutionizing urethral stricture treatment.Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- A double-layer PLGA/CoI-MeHA tissue engineering scaffold for urethral reconstruction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The effect of platelet-rich fibrin on the biological properties of urothelial cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A novel trauma induced urethral stricture in rat model.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Cell-Based Therapy for Urethral Regeneration: A Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Biological Macromolecule-Based Scaffolds for Urethra Reconstruction.Biomolecules · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries to the urethra can be caused by malformations, trauma, inflammation, or carcinoma, and reconstruction of the injured urethra is still a significant challenge in clinical urology. Implanting grafts for urethroplasty and end-to-end anastomosis are typical clinical interventions for urethral injury. However, complications and high recurrence rates remain unsatisfactory. To address this, urethral tissue engineering provides a promising modality for urethral repair. Additionally, developing tailor-made biomimetic natural and synthetic grafts is of great significance for urethral reconstruction. In this work, tailor-made biomimetic natural and synthetic grafts are divided into scaffold-free and scaffolded grafts according to their structures, and the influence of different graft structures on urethral reconstruction is discussed. In addition, future development and potential clinical application strategies of future urethral reconstruction grafts are predicted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.