Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045369›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2022

Does the level of inferior mesenteric artery ligation affect short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with sigmoid colon cancer or rectal cancer? A single-center retrospective study.

Yawei Wang, Yan Wang, Liaonan Zou, Lingna Deng, Tianchong Wu, Linsen Liu, Jiling Jiang, Tailai An

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surgical considerations for the "perfect" colorectal anastomosis.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yawei Wang *The First Department of Surgery, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Fuhua Road 1, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518033, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yan Wang *Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Dongmen Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Liaonan ZouDepartment of General Surgery, The Affiliated Zhuhai Hospital, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jingle Road 52, Xiangzhou District, Zhuhai, 519015, Guangdong, China.
Lingna DengDepartment of Pathology, Qingyuan People's Hospital, Yinquan Road B24, Qingcheng District, 511518, Qingyuan, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Tianchong WuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Dongmen Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Linsen LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Dongmen Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jiling JiangThe First Department of Surgery, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Fuhua Road 1, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518033, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. 405836898@qq.com.
Tailai AnDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Dongmen Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020, Guangdong, People's Republic of China. antailai@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Shenzhen Luohu People's Hospital · CNGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNQingzhou City People's Hospital · CN

Funding

Clinical research and cultivation project of Shenzhen People's Hospital No.SYLCYJ202003Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of Shenzhen No.JCYJ20180228164603659, No.JCYJ20180507182437217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor sigmoid colon or rectal cancer, a definite consensus regarding the optimal level ligating the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) has not been reached. We performed this study to determine whether the ligation level significantly affected short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer after curative laparoscopic surgery.

methodsMedical records of patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer who had undergone curative laparoscopic surgery between January 2008 and December 2014 at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were reviewed. Then, the high tie group (HTG) was compared with the low tie group (LTG) in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.

resultsFive-hundred ninety patients were included. No significant differences between two groups regarding baseline characteristics existed. HTG had a significantly higher risk of anastomotic fistula than LTG (21/283 vs 11/307, P = 0.040). Additionally, high ligation was proven by multivariate logistic regression analysis to be an independent factor for anastomotic fistula (P = 0.038, OR = 2.232, 95% CI: 1.047-4.758). Furthermore, LT resulted in better preserved urinary function. However, LTG was not significantly different from HTG regarding operative time (P = 0.075), blood transfusion (P = 1.000), estimated blood loss (P = 0.239), 30-day mortality (P = 1.000), ICU stay (P = 0.674), postoperative hospital stay (days) (P = 0.636), bowel obstruction (P = 0.659), ileus (P = 0.637), surgical site infection (SSI) (P = 0.121), number of retrieved lymph nodes (P = 0.501), and number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.131). Subsequently, it was revealed that level of IMA ligation did not significantly influence overall survival (OS) (P = 0.474) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.722). Additionally, it was revealed that ligation level did not significantly affect OS (P = 0.460) and RFS (P = 0.979) of patients with stage 1 cancer, which was also observed among patients with stage 2 or stage 3 cancer. Ultimately, ligation level was not an independent predictive factor for either OS or RFS.

conclusionsHT resulted in a significantly higher incidence of anastomotic fistula and worse preservation of urinary function. Level of IMA ligation did not significantly affect long-term outcomes of patients with sigmoid colon or rectal cancer after curative laparoscopic surgery.

Indexed as

Intestinal ObstructionLaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsSigmoid NeoplasmsColon, SigmoidHumansLigationLymph Node ExcisionMesenteric Artery, InferiorNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAnastomotic fistulaHigh tieInferior mesenteric arteryLaparoscopic surgeryLow tieShort-term and long-term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36045369
PMCPMC9434919
OpenAlexW4293920047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.