Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045350›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2022

A method for labelling lesions for machine learning and some new observations on osteochondrosis in computed tomographic scans of four pig joints.

Kristin Olstad, Lars Erik Gangsei, Jørgen Kongsro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin OlstadFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Equine Section, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway. kristin.olstad@nmbu.no.
Lars Erik GangseiAnimalia AS, Lørenveien 38, 0585, Oslo, Norway.
Jørgen KongsroNorsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, 2317, Hamar, Norway.
Animalia (Norway) · NONorsvin (Norway) · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 295083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteochondrosis is a major cause of leg weakness in pigs. Selection against osteochondrosis is currently based on manual scoring of computed tomographic (CT) scans for the presence of osteochondrosis manifesta lesions. It would be advantageous if osteochondrosis could be diagnosed automatically, through artificial intelligence methods using machine learning. The aim of this study was to describe a method for labelling articular osteochondrosis lesions in CT scans of four pig joints to guide development of future machine learning algorithms, and to report new observations made during the labelling process. The shoulder, elbow, stifle and hock joints were evaluated in CT scans of 201 pigs.

resultsSix thousand two hundred fifty osteochondrosis manifesta and cyst-like lesions were labelled in 201 pigs representing a total volume of 211,721.83 mm

conclusionsThe described labelling method is an important step towards developing a machine learning algorithm that will enable automated diagnosis of osteochondrosis manifesta and cyst-like lesions. Both lesion number and volume should be considered during breeding selection. The apparent inverse relationship between lesion number and volume warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

CystsOsteochondrosisSwine DiseasesAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceJointsMachine LearningSwineTomography, X-Ray ComputedArticular osteochondrosisBreeding selectionHelical computed tomographyLesion numberLesion volumeMachine learningSwine

Identifiers

PMID36045350
PMCPMC9429582
OpenAlexW4293767674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.