Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045345›Full record

Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022

The effect of co-dependent (thinking in motion [TIM]) versus single-modality (CogniFit) interventions on cognition and gait among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled study.

Shiri Embon-Magal, Tal Krasovsky, Israel Doron, Kfir Asraf, Iris Haimov, Efrat Gil, Maayan Agmon

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exergaming for dementia and mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shiri Embon-MagalDepartment of Gerontology, Faculty of Social Science and Welfare, University of Haifa, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Tal KrasovskySchool of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Science and Welfare, University of Haifa, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Israel DoronDepartment of Gerontology, CRSA - Center for Research & Study of Aging, Faculty of Social Science and Welfare, University of Haifa, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Kfir AsrafDepartment of Psychology, University of Haifa, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Iris HaimovDepartment of Psychology, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Efrat Gil *Clalit Health Services, Neve-Yamin, Israel.
Maayan Agmon *School of Nursing, Faculty of Social Science and Welfare, University of Haifa, Neve-Yamin, Israel. magmon@univ.haifa.ac.il.
University of Haifa · ILMax Stern Academic College of Emek Yezreel · ILTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognition and motor skills are interrelated throughout the aging process and often show simultaneous deterioration among older adults with cognitive impairment. Co-dependent training has the potential to ameliorate both domains; however, its effect on the gait and cognition of older adults with cognitive impairment has yet to be explored. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of the well-established single-modality cognitive computerized training program, CogniFit, with "Thinking in Motion (TIM)," a co-dependent group intervention, among community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment.

methodsEmploying a single-blind randomized control trial design, 47 community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of thrice-weekly trainings of TIM or CogniFit. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included cognitive performance, evaluated by a CogniFit battery, as a primary outcome; and gait, under single- and dual-task conditions, as a secondary outcome.

resultsCogniFit total Z scores significantly improved from baseline to post-intervention for both groups. There was a significant main effect for time [F (1, 44) = 17.43, p < .001, η

conclusionsThe findings show that single-modality (CogniFit) and co-dependent (TIM) trainings improve cognition but not gait in older adults with cognitive impairment. Such investigations should be extended to include various populations and a broader set of outcome measurements.

trial registrationACTRN12616001543471. Date: 08/11/2016.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionIndependent LivingAgedCognitionExercise TherapyHumansSingle-Blind MethodTask Performance and AnalysisBrain agingMotor-cognitive interventionRemedial intervention

Identifiers

PMID36045345
PMCPMC9429752
OpenAlexW4293764988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.