Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045334›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Clinical significance of p53 protein expression and TP53 variation status in colorectal cancer.

Kyoung Min Kim, Ae-Ri Ahn, Ho Sung Park, Kyu Yun Jang, Woo Sung Moon, Myoung Jae Kang, Gi Won Ha, Min Ro Lee, Myoung Ja Chung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Preclinical Characterization of CLSP-1025, a First-in-Class, Mutation-Specific T-Cell Engager Targeting a Neoantigen Derived from a Common p53 Mutation.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Correlation ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyoung Min Kim *Departments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Ae-Ri Ahn *Departments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Ho Sung ParkDepartments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Yun JangDepartments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Woo Sung MoonDepartments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Myoung Jae KangDepartments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea.
Gi Won HaDepartment of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, and Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Min Ro LeeDepartment of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, and Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Myoung Ja ChungDepartments of Pathology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University, Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, and Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, San 2-20 Keumam-Dong Dukjin-gu, Jeonju, 54907, Republic of Korea. mjchung@jbnu.ac.kr.
Jeonbuk National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In human colorectal cancer (CRC), TP53 is one of the most important driver genes. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been used most often to assess the variational status of TP53. Recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the TP53 gene has increased. However, to our knowledge, a comparison between TP53 status evaluated by IHC and NGS has not been studied. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical effect of TP53 status evaluated by IHC and NGS in patients with CRC. The secondary aim was to investigate the correlation between expression of p53 by IHC and variational status of TP53 by NGS. We performed immunohistochemical staining of p53 and sequencing of TP53 by NGS in 204 human samples of CRC. We then analyzed the correlation between variational status of TP53 and p53 expression, along with their prognostic impact in CRC patients. There was significant correlation between p53 expression and TP53 variation, TP53 variation and higher N stage, and positive p53 expression and higher N stage. Positive IHC expression of p53 was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) of CRC patients by univariate analysis and was revealed as an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. Additionally, the nonsense/frameshift p53 expression pattern showed a significantly better prognosis than the wild type and missense p53 expression patterns. However, the variational status of TP53 was not significant in OS of CRC patients. These results suggest that IHC expression of p53 protein correlates with variation status of TP53 and expression of p53 protein rather than variation status of TP53 has more significant impact on the OS of CRC patients.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenes, p53HumansImmunohistochemistryMutationPrognosisTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Colorectal cancerImmunohistochemistryNext-generation sequencingTP53

Identifiers

PMID36045334
PMCPMC9434900
OpenAlexW4294124568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.