ArticleBMC microbiology2022
Different rhizosphere soil microbes are recruited by tomatoes with different fruit color phenotypes.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergence in the tomato rhizosphere microbial community structure driven by three soil types.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of the tomato rhizosphere microbiome in response to synthetic communities of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Effects of Inorganic Phosphorus-Solubilizing Bacteria on Rhizosphere Phosphorus Forms and Steroid Saponin Content ofBiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling diversity and adaptations of the wild tomato Microbiome in their center of origin in the Ecuadorian Andes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can Functional Micro-organisms Associated with Pumpkin Sizes Be Sought Out from the Soil?-A Comparison of Soil Microbial Community Structures in Rhizospheres between Giant- and Small-Sized Pumpkin Varieties.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The rhizosphere microbiome of 51 potato cultivars with diverse plant growth characteristics.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2024Article
- Endophytic Microorganisms in Tomato Roots, Changes in the Structure and Function of the Community at Different Growing Stages.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- How Rhizosphere Microbial Assemblage Is Influenced by Dragon Fruits with White and Red Flesh.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterization of Microbial Diversity of Two Tomato Cultivars through Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing 16S rRNA and ITS Techniques.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Changes in Soil Phosphorus Availability and Microbial Community Structures in Rhizospheres of Oilseed Rapes Induced by Intercropping with White Lupins.Microorganisms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore and utilize abundant soil microbes and their beneficial functions, the bacterial and fungal compositions in rhizospheres between red- and yellow-fruited tomato varieties were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing technique.
resultOur results indicated that different soil microbes in rhizospheres of tomatoes were exactly recruited by different color fruit tomatoes. For the reasons as not only soil bacterial community, but also soil fungal compositions were all different between red and yellow fruit tomatoes. For example, Nocardioides, norank_f_norank_o_Vicinamibacterales, norank_f_norank_o_norank_c_KD4-96, norank_f_Birii41, norank_f_norank_o_S085 and Bradyrhizobium were the specific dominant soil bacterial genera, and Lecythophora, Derxomyces and unclassified_f_Pyronemataceae were the dominant soil fungal genera in the rhizospheres of red tomato varieties. By contrast, unclassified_f__Micromonsporaceae, Acidipila, Roseisolibacter, Gaiella and norank_f_Xanthobacteraceae were the unique dominant soil bacterial genera in the rhizospheres of yellow tomato varieties. And unclassified_o__Onygenales, Trichocladium, unclassified_c__Sordariomycetes, Pseudogymnoascus, Acremonium, Oidiodendron, Phialemonium, Penicillium, Phialosimplex were the unique dominant soil fungal genera in rhizospheres of yellow tomato varieties. Moreover, a higher abundance of specific soil bacterial and fungal genera in the rhizosphere was found in rhizospheres of the yellow than those of the red tomato varieties.
conclusionSoil bacterial and fungal compositions in rhizospheres between red- and yellow-fruited tomato varieties were found significantly different which growing in the same environment under the identical managements. It suggested that different soil microbes in rhizospheres exactly were recruited by different phenotypes tomato varieties related to fruit color formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.