Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045131›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Large contribution of fossil-derived components to aqueous secondary organic aerosols in China.

Buqing Xu, Gan Zhang, Örjan Gustafsson, Kimitaka Kawamura, Jun Li, August Andersson, Srinivas Bikkina, Bhagawati Kunwar, Ambarish Pokhrel, Guangcai Zhong and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Toxicological Effects of Secondary Air Pollutants.Chemical research in Chinese universities · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Buqing XuState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-648X
Gan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China. zhanggan@gig.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9010-8140
Örjan GustafssonDepartment of Environment Science and the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 10691, Sweden. orjan.gustafsson@aces.su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-0527
Kimitaka KawamuraChubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Chubu University, Kasugai, 487-8501, Japan.
Jun LiState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3637-1642
August AnderssonDepartment of Environment Science and the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, 10691, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4659-7055
Srinivas BikkinaChubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Chubu University, Kasugai, 487-8501, Japan.
Bhagawati KunwarChubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Chubu University, Kasugai, 487-8501, Japan.
Ambarish PokhrelChubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Chubu University, Kasugai, 487-8501, Japan.
Guangcai ZhongState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Shizhen ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-9283
Jing LiState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Chen HuangState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Zhineng ChengState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6598-849X
Sanyuan ZhuState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.
Pingan PengState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-8451
Guoying ShengState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510640, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incomplete understanding of the sources of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) leads to large uncertainty in both air quality management and in climate change assessment. Chemical reactions occurring in the atmospheric aqueous phase represent an important source of SOA mass, yet, the effects of anthropogenic emissions on the aqueous SOA (aqSOA) are not well constrained. Here we use compound-specific dual-carbon isotopic fingerprints (δ

Indexed as

Air PollutantsAerosolsCarbon IsotopesChinaFossilsWaterAerosolsAir PollutantsCarbon IsotopesWater

Identifiers

PMID36045131
PMCPMC9433442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.