Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045130›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Reproducibility of real-world evidence studies using clinical practice data to inform regulatory and coverage decisions.

Shirley V Wang, Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara, Sebastian Schneeweiss, REPEAT Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shirley V WangDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. swang1@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-7090
Sushama Kattinakere SreedharaDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
REPEAT Initiative

Funding

Randomized Cardiovascular Trials Duplicated Using Prospective Longitudinal Insurance Claims: Applying Techniques of Epidemiology (RCT DUPLICATE)R01HL141505 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SCHNEEWEISS, SEBASTIAN G., WANG, SHIRLEY · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
Understanding effectiveness of new drugs in older adults shortly after market entryR01AG053302 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WANG, SHIRLEY · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
A Phenome-Wide Association Study to Identify and Characterize Phenotypic Effects of Lp(a)F32HL149256 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LEE, MOA PARK · 2020 to 2022
$121k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL149256NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141505NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies that generate real-world evidence on the effects of medical products through analysis of digital data collected in clinical practice provide key insights for regulators, payers, and other healthcare decision-makers. Ensuring reproducibility of such findings is fundamental to effective evidence-based decision-making. We reproduce results for 150 studies published in peer-reviewed journals using the same healthcare databases as original investigators and evaluate the completeness of reporting for 250. Original and reproduction effect sizes were positively correlated (Pearson's correlation = 0.85), a strong relationship with some room for improvement. The median and interquartile range for the relative magnitude of effect (e.g., hazard ratio

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDatabases, FactualData CollectionReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID36045130
PMCPMC9430007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.