ArticleApplied clinical informatics2022
Improving Asthma Care Documentation with a Digital Tool-Experience in a Pediatric Institution.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Cost Savings Associated with a Patient-Facing Asthma Mobile Health Intervention.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Epidemiology of patients with asthma in Korea: Analysis of the NHISS database 2006-2015.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Article
- Workflow Improvement of Electronic Health Record Usage in a Tertiary Pediatric Burns Clinic.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma affects approximately 10% of Australian children. Electronic medical record (EMR) systems and clinical decision support initiatives have been shown to improve the delivery of asthma care. Our institution implemented an EMR-based asthma "hub," which collates asthma-related information to a central location within a patient's record, provides a template to collect relevant clinical information, allows clinicians to evaluate a patient's history and presentation in a systematic manner and prompts relevant actions.
objectiveThe aim of the study is to measure year-on-year improvement in asthma-related documentation and provide a key gold-standard aspects of asthma management after the introduction of an EMR asthma "hub" tool in the outpatient setting.
methodsThe asthma "hub" was introduced in November 2020. A chart review was conducted of all patients who attended the Complex Asthma Clinic between January-April 2020 and January-April 2021. The provision and presence of documentation of core aspects of asthma care were described in percentages and comparisons of pre- and post-introduction of the asthma "hub" were assessed.
resultsThere was a significant increase in the documentation of asthma triggers, including smoking/smoker exposure, (47.5-92.6%,
conclusionAn evidence-based EMR intervention improved the documentation and provision of aspects of asthma care in an outpatient clinic setting at a tertiary pediatric hospital, suggesting replication in the inpatient and emergency settings would be worthwhile. Further research is required to understand the tool's impact on clinical outcomes and on clinical efficiency and workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.