Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044582›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

When self comes to a wandering mind: Brain representations and dynamics of self-generated concepts in spontaneous thought.

Byeol Kim Lux, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna, Jihoon Han, Eunjin Lee, Choong-Wan Woo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural Dynamics of Self-Referential Processing and the Insight for Decoding Self-Concepts.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Brain decoding of spontaneous thought: Predictive modeling of self-relevance and valence using personal narratives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Byeol Kim LuxCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2691-2334
Jessica R Andrews-HannaDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1769-6756
Jihoon HanCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6908-9694
Eunjin LeeCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9465-6008
Choong-Wan WooCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7423-5422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-relevant concepts are major building blocks of spontaneous thought, and their dynamics in a natural stream of thought are likely to reveal one's internal states that are important for mental health. Here, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging experiment (

Identifiers

PMID36044582
PMCPMC9432827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.