Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044580›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Crossing nerve transfer drives sensory input-dependent plasticity for motor recovery after brain injury.

Zhengrun Gao, Zhen Pang, Gaowei Lei, Yiming Chen, Zeyu Cai, Shuai Zhu, Weishan Lin, Zilong Qiu, Yizheng Wang, Yundong Shen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Research advances in nerve transfer for upper limb function restoration: applications from peripheral nerve injury to central nervous system injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhengrun GaoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-8385
Zhen PangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Gaowei LeiDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiming ChenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zeyu CaiDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-956X
Shuai ZhuDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Weishan LinDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-6599
Zilong QiuThe National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-3288
Yizheng WangThe National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9214-2596
Yundong ShenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2049-498X
Wendong XuDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3085-5806

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restoring limb movements after central nervous system injury remains a substantial challenge. Recent studies proved that crossing nerve transfer surgery could rebuild physiological connectivity between the contralesional cortex and the paralyzed arm to compensate for the lost function after brain injury. However, the neural mechanism by which this surgery mediates motor recovery remains still unclear. Here, using a clinical mouse model, we showed that this surgery can restore skilled forelimb function in adult mice with unilateral cortical lesion by inducing cortical remapping and promoting corticospinal tract sprouting. After reestablishing the ipsilateral descending pathway, resecting of the artificially rebuilt peripheral nerve did not affect motor improvements. Furthermore, retaining the sensory afferent, but not the motor efferent, of the transferred nerve was sufficient for inducing brain remapping and facilitating motor restoration. Thus, our results demonstrate that surgically rebuilt sensory input triggers neural plasticity for accelerating motor recovery, which provides an approach for treating central nervous system injuries.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesNerve TransferAnimalsForelimbMiceNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal Tracts

Identifiers

PMID36044580
PMCPMC9432844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.