Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044409›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Comparative inequalities in child dental caries across four countries: Examination of international birth cohorts and implications for oral health policy.

Sharon Goldfeld, Kate L Francis, Elodie O'Connor, Johnny Ludvigsson, Tomas Faresjö, Beatrice Nikiema, Lise Gauvin, Junwen Yang-Huang, Yara Abu Awad, Jennifer J McGrath and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sharon GoldfeldCentre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6520-7094
Kate L FrancisMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Elodie O'ConnorCentre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Johnny LudvigssonCrown Princess Victoria Children´s Hospital and Div of Pediatrics, Dept of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Tomas FaresjöDept of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Beatrice NikiemaCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7434-1682
Lise GauvinCentre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Junwen Yang-HuangThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yara Abu AwadPERFORM Centre & Department of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
Jennifer J McGrathPERFORM Centre & Department of Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
Jeremy D Goldhaber-FiebertStanford Health Policy, Centers for Health Policy and Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Åshild FaresjoDept of Health, Medicine and Caring Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Hein RaatDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lea KragtThe Generation R Study Group, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fiona K MensahMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
EPOCH Collaborative Group

Funding

CIHR MOP-89886CIHR MSH-95353CIHR OCO-79897CIHR ROG-110537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child dental caries (i.e., cavities) are a major preventable health problem in most high-income countries. The aim of this study was to compare the extent of inequalities in child dental caries across four high-income countries alongside their child oral health policies. Coordinated analyses of data were conducted across four prospective population-based birth cohorts (Australia, n = 4085, born 2004; Québec, Canada, n = 1253, born 1997; Rotterdam, the Netherlands, n = 6690, born 2002; Southeast Sweden, n = 7445, born 1997), which enabled a high degree of harmonization. Risk ratios (adjusted) and slope indexes of inequality were estimated to quantify social gradients in child dental caries according to maternal education and household income. Children in the least advantaged quintile for income were at greater risk of caries, compared to the most advantaged quintile: Australia: AdjRR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.04-1.34; Québec: AdjRR = 1.69, 95%CI = 1.36-2.10; Rotterdam: AdjRR = 1.67, 95%CI = 1.36-2.04; Southeast Sweden: AdjRR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.10-1.71). There was a higher risk of caries for children of mothers with the lowest level of education, compared to the highest: Australia: AdjRR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.01-1.38; Southeast Sweden: AdjRR = 2.31, 95%CI = 1.81-2.96; Rotterdam: AdjRR = 1.98, 95%CI = 1.71-2.30; Québec: AdjRR = 1.16, 95%CI = 0.98-1.37. The extent of inequalities varied in line with jurisdictional policies for provision of child oral health services and preventive public health measures. Clear gradients of social inequalities in child dental caries are evident in high-income countries. Policy related mechanisms may contribute to the differences in the extent of these inequalities. Lesser gradients in settings with combinations of universal dental coverage and/or fluoridation suggest these provisions may ameliorate inequalities through additional benefits for socio-economically disadvantaged groups of children.

Indexed as

Birth CohortDental CariesChildHealth PolicyHumansOral HealthProspective StudiesSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID36044409
PMCPMC9432734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.