Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044406›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Human genotype-to-phenotype predictions: Boosting accuracy with nonlinear models.

Aleksandr Medvedev, Satyarth Mishra Sharma, Evgenii Tsatsorin, Elena Nabieva, Dmitry Yarotsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge-Driven Feature Selection and Engineering for Genotype Data with Large Language Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Machine Learning Strategies for Improved Phenotype Prediction in Underrepresented Populations.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aleksandr MedvedevSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6871-4240
Satyarth Mishra SharmaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Evgenii TsatsorinSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Elena NabievaSkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry YarotskySkolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotype-to-phenotype prediction is a central problem of human genetics. In recent years, it has become possible to construct complex predictive models for phenotypes, thanks to the availability of large genome data sets as well as efficient and scalable machine learning tools. In this paper, we make a threefold contribution to this problem. First, we ask if state-of-the-art nonlinear predictive models, such as boosted decision trees, can be more efficient for phenotype prediction than conventional linear models. We find that this is indeed the case if model features include a sufficiently rich set of covariates, but probably not otherwise. Second, we ask if the conventional selection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) by genome wide association studies (GWAS) can be replaced by a more efficient procedure, taking into account information in previously selected SNPs. We propose such a procedure, based on a sequential feature importance estimation with decision trees, and show that this approach indeed produced informative SNP sets that are much more compact than when selected with GWAS. Finally, we show that the highest prediction accuracy can ultimately be achieved by ensembling individual linear and nonlinear models. To the best of our knowledge, for some of the phenotypes that we consider (asthma, hypothyroidism), our results are a new state-of-the-art.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypeHumansModels, GeneticNonlinear DynamicsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID36044406
PMCPMC9432766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.