Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044266›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022

Identifying Influences in Patient Decision-making Processes in Online Health Communities: Data Science Approach.

Mingda Li, Jinhe Shi, Yi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mingda LiYing Wu College of Computing, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0692-7598
Jinhe ShiYing Wu College of Computing, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-4212
Yi ChenMartin Tuchman School of Management, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3669-1643

Funding

New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, an increasing number of users have joined online health communities (OHCs) to obtain information and seek support. Patients often look for information and suggestions to support their health care decision-making. It is important to understand patient decision-making processes and identify the influences that patients receive from OHCs.

objectiveWe aimed to identify the posts in discussion threads that have influence on users who seek help in their decision-making.

methodsWe proposed a definition of influence relationship of posts in discussion threads. We then developed a framework and a deep learning model for identifying influence relationships. We leveraged the state-of-the-art text relevance measurement methods to generate sparse feature vectors to present text relevance. We modeled the probability of question and action presence in a post as dense features. We then used deep learning techniques to combine the sparse and dense features to learn the influence relationships.

resultsWe evaluated the proposed techniques on discussion threads from a popular cancer survivor OHC. The empirical evaluation demonstrated the effectiveness of our approach.

conclusionsIt is feasible to identify influence relationships in OHCs. Using the proposed techniques, a significant number of discussions on an OHC were identified to have had influence. Such discussions are more likely to affect user decision-making processes and engage users' participation in OHCs. Studies on those discussions can help improve information quality, user engagement, and user experience.

Indexed as

Data ScienceHumansdecision-making threadsdeep learninginfluence relationshiponline health communitiespatient engagementtext relevance measurement

Identifiers

PMID36044266
PMCPMC9475411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.