ArticleJAMA network open2022
Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancers.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parental and childhood exposures and the risk of retinoblastoma, hepatoblastoma, and germ cell, bone, and soft tissue tumors in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancer Among the Offspring of Parents With Infertility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Cumulative temporal association between assisted reproductive technology and childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Risk factors for childhood brain tumours: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies from 1976 to 2022.Cancer epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- A Population-Based Assessment of Cancer Risk in Children With VACTERL.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2026Article
- Heterogeneous offspring growth in spontaneous versus in vitro fertilization pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- The rationale, design of the Assisted reproductive technology cohort nested in a pre-pregnancy family cohort (APP-Cohort).Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Pubertal development at age 12 in children born after fertility treatment: the Taiwan Birth Cohort Study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Sex differences in childhood cancer risk following ART conception: a registry-based study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Infertility - a Great Challenge of the Past, Present, and Future.Materia socio-medica · 2025Review
- Successful Pregnancy and Delivery after Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Following the Third Discontinuation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in a Woman with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Altered metabolic profiles in male offspring conceived from intracytoplasmic sperm injection.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of ART treatments on maternal and neonatal outcomes in singleton live births: A large-scale retrospective cohort study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Medically Assisted Reproduction and Risk of Cancer Among Offspring.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing in the current era, a review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Infertility Treatments Resulting in Twin Pregnancy: Does It Increase the Risk for Future Childhood Malignancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Cancer risk in children, adolescents, and young adults conceived by ART in 1983-2011.Human reproduction open · 2023Article
- Update and new advances in fertility preservation and cancer.CA: a cancer journal for cliniciansReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The number of children born through the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been increasing. These children may have higher risks for epigenetic alteration and adverse perinatal outcomes, which may be associated with childhood cancers. Objective: To determine the associations between different modes of conception and childhood cancers and potential mediation by preterm birth and low birth weight. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, population-based cohort study included registry data from 2 308 016 eligible parents-child triads in Taiwan from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2017. A total of 1880 children with incident childhood cancer were identified. Data were analyzed between September 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022. Exposure: Mode of conception, defined as (1) natural conception, (2) subfertility and non-ART (ie, infertility diagnosis but no ART-facilitated conception), or (3) ART (ie, infertility diagnosis and ART-facilitated conception). Main Outcomes and Measures: Diagnosis of childhood cancer according to the International Classification of Childhood Cancers, Third Edition. Results: The mean (SD) paternal and maternal ages were 33.28 (5.07) and 30.83 (4.56) years, respectively. Of the 2 308 016 children, 52.06% were boys, 8.16% were born preterm, and 7.38% had low birth weight. During 14.9 million person-years of follow-up (median, 6 years [IQR, 3-10 years]), ART conception was associated with an increased risk of any type of childhood cancers compared with natural conception (hazard ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17-2.12) and subfertility with non-ART conception (hazard ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95). The increased cancer risk of children conceived with ART was mainly owing to leukemia and hepatic tumor. The increased cancer risk associated with ART conception was not mediated by preterm birth or low birth weight. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, children conceived via ART had a higher risk of childhood cancers than those conceived naturally and those born to parents with an infertility diagnosis did not use ART. The increased risk could not be explained by preterm birth or low birth weight.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.