Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044169›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2023

Cost-effectiveness analysis of five drugs for treating postmenopausal women in the United States with osteoporosis and a very high fracture risk.

C Luo, S-X Qin, Q-Y Wang, Y-F Li, X-L Qu, C Yue, L Hu, Z-F Sheng, X-B Wang, X-M Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploring the Role ofOrthopedic research and reviews · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis medications for preventing periprosthetic fractures following femoral neck fracture indicated hip arthroplasty: a break-even analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C LuoHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
S-X QinDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Q-Y WangHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Y-F LiHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
X-L QuHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
C YueHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
L HuHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Z-F ShengHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Health Management Center, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China. shengzhifeng@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2308-3024
X-B WangDivisions of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Nutrition, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
X-M WanDepartment of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Middle Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China. wanxiaomin@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Changsha Municipal Natural Science Foundation kq2014251Degree& Postgraduate Education Reform Project of Central South University 512190112Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University 512191022Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate CX20210372National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870622Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission 202112070631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFive strategies were recommended by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) guidelines for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) patients with a very high fracture risk. We aimed to assess their cost-effectiveness in the United States (US).

methodsA microsimulation Markov model was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of five treatment strategies, including zoledronate, denosumab, abaloparatide, teriparatide, and romosozumab in PMO patients with a recent fracture from the healthcare perspective of the US. The data used in the model were obtained from published studies or online resources. Base-case analysis, one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) and probability sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted for 65-, 70-, 75-, and 80-year-old patients.

resultsIn base case, at 65 years, zoledronate was the cheapest strategy. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER, which represent incremental costs per QALY gained) of denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab against zoledronate were $13,020/QALY (quality-adjusted years), $477,331 /QALY, $176,287/QALY, and $98,953/QALY, respectively. Under a willing-to-pay (WTP, which means the highest price a consumer will pay for one unit of a good of service) threshold of $150,000/QALY, denosumab and romosozumab were cost-effective against zoledronate. The PSA results showed that denosumab was the most cost-effective option with WTP thresholds of $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY. The results were similar in other age groups. The DSA results indicated that the most common parameters that have important influence on the outcome were drug persistence, incidence of adverse events, the efficacy of drugs on hip fractures and the cost of the drug. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among PMO patients with a very high fracture risk in the US, zoledronate is the cheapest strategy and denosumab is the most cost-effective choice among these five strategies.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsHip FracturesOsteoporosisOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDenosumabFemaleHumansPostmenopauseTeriparatideUnited StatesZoledronic AcidBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabTeriparatideZoledronic AcidCost-effective analysisOsteoporosisTreatmentVery high fracture risk

Identifiers

PMID36044169
PMCPMC9428883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.