Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36044158›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2023

Immune checkpoint inhibition improves antimyeloma activity of bortezomib and STING agonist combination in Vk*MYC preclinical model.

Olga Sokolowska, Anna Rodziewicz-Lurzynska, Zofia Pilch, Hanna Kedzierska, Justyna Chlebowska-Tuz, Anna Sosnowska, Anna Szumera-Cieckiewicz, Kamil Sokol, Joanna Barankiewicz, Aleksander Salomon-Perzynski and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. STING Protein-Based In Situ Vaccine Synergizes CD4Advanced healthcare materials · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga SokolowskaLaboratory of Experimental Medicine, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha, 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Rodziewicz-LurzynskaCentral Laboratory, University Clinical Center of Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1A, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Zofia PilchDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nielubowicza 5, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Hanna KedzierskaLaboratory of Experimental Medicine, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha, 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Justyna Chlebowska-TuzLaboratory of Experimental Medicine, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha, 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna SosnowskaDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nielubowicza 5, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Anna Szumera-CieckiewiczDepartment of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland.
Kamil SokolDiagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Indiri Ghandi 14, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna BarankiewiczDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Indiri Ghandi 14, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Aleksander Salomon-PerzynskiDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Indiri Ghandi 14, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Olga CiepielaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1A, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewa Lech-MarandaDepartment of Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Indiri Ghandi 14, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.
Jakub GolabDepartment of Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nielubowicza 5, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Dominika NowisLaboratory of Experimental Medicine, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, Banacha, 2C, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. dominika.nowis@wum.edu.pl.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLInstytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PLUniversity of Warsaw · PL

Funding

Polish Ministry of Education and Science 013/RID/2018/19 (Regional Initiative for Excellence), project budget 12,000,000 PLNPolish National Science Centre 2015/17/N/NZ6/04260Polish National Science Centre 2016/23/B/NZ6/03463Polish National Science Centre 2017/25/B/NZ6/01139
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy of plasma cells, has remained incurable despite the development of novel therapies that improve patients' outcome. Recent evidence indicates that the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) pathway may represent a novel target for induction of antitumor immune response in multiple myeloma. Here, we investigated antitumor effects of STING agonist with bortezomib with or without checkpoint inhibitor in the treatment of MM.

methodsSTING expression in bone marrow plasma cells of 58 MM patients was examined by immunohistochemical staining. The effectiveness of the proposed therapy was evaluated in vivo in a syngeneic transplantable mouse model of MM (Vĸ*MYC) in immunocompetent mice. Flow cytometry was used to assess tumor burden and investigate activation of immune response against MM. ELISA was performed to measure serum inflammatory cytokines concentrations upon treatment.

resultsCombining a STING agonist [2'3'-cGAM(PS)

conclusionsOur findings indicate high antimyeloma efficacy of the three-drug regimen comprising bortezomib, STING agonist, and a checkpoint inhibitor.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaAnimalsBortezomibCytokinesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMiceT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentBortezomibCytokinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBortezomibcGAMPImmune checkpoint inhibitorMultiple myelomaPD-1STING

Identifiers

PMID36044158
PMCPMC10460740
OpenAlexW4293714869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.