SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022
Survival times of patients with glioblastoma in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of life and outcomes of patients operated on for glioblastoma.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Gaps in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes Among Patients with Brain Tumors in the United States: A State-of-the-Art Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Challenges and Opportunities in Accessing Surgery for Glioblastoma in Low-Middle Income Countries: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2024Article
- Successful application of dietary ketogenic metabolic therapy in patients with glioblastoma: a clinical study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known about the survivorship of glioblastoma (GBM) patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We hypothesize that this would be lower than published figures for high-income countries due to cancer health disparities. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the median overall survival (OS) of GBM in LMICs and determine factors affecting OS. A systematic review of 12 electronic databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify studies of newly diagnosed adult GBM patients done in countries classified as LMIC by the World Bank (WB) from inception to December 2020. Random effects meta-analysis of collected median overall survival data was done. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were done to determine if WB income classification (WBIC), start year of recruitment (pre- or post-popularization of the standard Stupp protocol), and treatment modality affected OS. The 24 articles (n = 2,552) that met the inclusion criteria were from 8 low-middle income and upper-middle income countries, with 0 articles from low-income countries. Random effects analysis of 24 studies showed a pooled median OS of 14.17 months (95% CI 12.90-15.43, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.