Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043919›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2022

The effects of Capparis ovata seed oil on the healing of traumatic skin wounds.

Salih Celepli, Bayram Çolak, Ümran Aydemir Sezer, Pınar Celepli, Irem Bigat, Mehmet Esat Duymuş, Muslu Kazım Körez, Sema Hücümenoğlu, Kemal Kismet, Mustafa Şahin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salih CelepliDepartment of General Surgery, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Bayram ÇolakDepartment of General Surgery, Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Türkiye.
Ümran Aydemir SezerDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta-Türkiye.
Pınar CelepliDepartment of Pathology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara-Türkiye.
Irem BigatDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, TOBB ETU, Ankara-Türkiye.
Mehmet Esat DuymuşDepartment of General Surgery, Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Hatay-Türkiye.
Muslu Kazım KörezDepartment of Biostatistics, Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Türkiye.
Sema HücümenoğluDepartment of Pathology, Health Sciences University, Ankara SUAM, Ankara-Türkiye.
Kemal KismetDepartment of Surgical Nursing, Selçuk University Faculty of Nursing, Konya-Türkiye.
Mustafa ŞahinDepartment of General Surgery, Selçuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya-Türkiye.
Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapparis ovata contains alkaloids, lipids, polyphenols, flavonoids, and also is rich in antioxidants. Conventionally, in Turkey, the flower buds, root, bark, and fruits of C. ovata are used for their analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-rheumatism, tonic, and diuretic effects. The aim of this study was to examine the effect on wound healing of C. ovata seed oil (COSO), which is known to have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibacterial properties.

methodsIn the study, 20 Wistar albino female rats were randomly divided into two groups of 10 animals each. A standard full-thickness skin defect was created on the back area of the rats. In both groups, after cleaning the wounds with saline daily, no active substance other than saline was applied to the control group, while 1 cc/day COSO was applied to the wounds of the rats in the study group. On the post-operative 14th day, the rats were reanesthetized and wound area measurements were made. Then, excision was performed to include 1 cm of intact tissue around the wound, which remained unhealed, and samples were taken for histopathological examination.

resultsThe changes in wound areas showed that after 14 days, the improvement in the group treated with caper oil (32.78; 95% confidence interval, 17.21-48.36) was significantly higher than that of the control group (65.41; 95% confidence interval, 49.84-80.98) (p=0.009). The histopathological scores showed a significant difference between the groups in respect of epithelial formation, inflam-mation, and fibrosis development. No epithelial tissue formation was observed in the control group (90%), and more incomplete re-epithelization and focal epidermal hyperplasia were observed in the treatment group (60%). Fibrosis development was mild and weak (70%) in the control group and was evaluated as severe and intense (60%) in the treatment group. Perivascular edema was mild (50%) and vascularity was immature (60% - an indicator of neovascularization) in the treatment group. These histopathological results showed that the treatment group inflammation phase was completed and the proliferation phase started, as well as the effectiveness of the use of caper oil on epithelization, angiogenesis, and fibrosis, which are important histopathological parameters in the evaluation of wound healing compared to the control group.

conclusionFrom the results of this study, it was concluded that COSO significantly enhances the healing of full-thickness skin wounds and this effect is primarily related to its anti-inflammatory effect.

Indexed as

CapparisAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsFibrosisPlant OilsRatsRats, WistarSkinWound HealingAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsPlant Oils

Identifiers

PMID36043919
PMCPMC10315948
OpenAlexW3176139450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.