Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043799›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2022

Case studies in neuroscience: reversible signatures of edema following electric and piezoelectric craniotomy drilling in macaques.

Rober Boshra, Manoj Eradath, Kacie Dougherty, Bichan Wu, Britney M Morea, Michael Harris, Mark A Pinsk, Sabine Kastner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rober BoshraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-199X
Manoj EradathPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0003-3300-4772
Kacie DoughertyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.ORCID 0000-0001-6295-0026
Bichan WuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Britney M MoreaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Michael HarrisPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Mark A PinskPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Sabine KastnerPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
Princeton University · US

Funding

Project 5: ComputationalP50MH109429 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI Robert Thomas Knight · 2017 to 2026
$25.3M
Functions of the Thalamus in Perception and CognitionR01EY017699 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI SABINE KASTNER · 2007 to 2026
$6.4M
Neural mechanisms of attentionR01MH064043 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI KASTNER, SABINE, KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017699NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH109429NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo electrophysiology requires direct access to brain tissue, necessitating the development and refinement of surgical procedures and techniques that promote the health and well-being of animal subjects. Here, we report a series of findings noted on structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in monkeys with MRI-compatible implants following small craniotomies that provide access for intracranial electrophysiology. We found distinct brain regions exhibiting hyperintensities in T2-weighted scans that were prominent underneath the sites at which craniotomies had been performed. We interpreted these hyperintensities as edema of the neural tissue and found that they were predominantly present following electric and piezoelectric drilling, but not when manual, hand-operated drills were used. Furthermore, the anomalies subsided within 2-3 wk following surgery. Our report highlights the utility of MRI-compatible implants that promote clinical examination of the animal's brain, sometimes revealing findings that may go unnoticed when incompatible implants are used. We show replicable differences in outcome when using electric versus mechanical devices, both ubiquitous in the field. If electric drills are used, our report cautions against electrophysiological recordings from tissue directly underneath the craniotomy for the first 2-3 wk following the procedure due to putative edema.

Indexed as

CraniotomyMacacaAnimalsBrainEdemaMagnetic Resonance ImagingcraniotomyMRIMRI-compatible implantsnonhuman primatepiezoelectric drill

Identifiers

PMID36043799
PMCPMC9550573
OpenAlexW4293762696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.