Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043680›Full record

SynthesisSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina

Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review.

Márcio Luís Duarte, Lucas Ribeiro Dos Santos, Wagner Iared, Maria Stella Peccin

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Systematic review of musculoskeletal ultrasound learning methodologies.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Márcio Luís DuarteMD, MSc, PhD. Musculoskeletal Radiologist, WEBIMAGEM Telerradiologia, São Paulo (SP), Brazil; and Professor, Ultrasonography, Centro Universitário Lusíada (UNILUS), Santos (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7874-9332
Lucas Ribeiro Dos SantosMD, MSc. Endocrinologist and Professor, Physiology and Internal Medicine, Centro Universitário Lusíada (UNILUS), Santos (SP), Brazil; and Doctoral Student, Evidence-Based Health Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-1198
Wagner IaredMD, PhD. Supervisor Professor, Evidence-Based Health Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6426-5636
Maria Stella PeccinPT, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Human Movement Sciences and Advisor, Evidence-Based Health Postgraduate Program, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-4588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of the web for radiological education is an obvious application. Many computer-based teaching materials have been developed over recent years, and e-learning is becoming increasingly popular in medical schools.

objectiveTo assess whether the effectiveness of distance-learning and/or e-learning, m-learning and web-based methods are equivalent to traditional methods. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review of comparative studies of teaching techniques guided by Best Evidence Medical Education.

methodsA search was carried out in the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Tripdatabase, CINAHL and LILACS online databases in April 2020, for original publications in all languages. The following MeSH terms were used: Ultrasonography; Teleradiology; Telemedicine; Education, Medical; Teaching; and Simulation Training; along with the terms e-learning, m-learning and web-based. All eligible studies were assessed using the Kirkpatrick model and Buckley's quality indicators.

resultsThe search in the databases and a manual search resulted in 4549 articles, of which 16 had sufficient methodological quality for their inclusion. From analysis of these data, it was observed that teaching of ultrasonography using telemedicine methods is similar to the traditional method, except for venous access procedures, for which the studies did not show agreement.

conclusionWe found that learning via telemedicine methodologies presents great acceptance among students, besides demonstrating quality similar to the traditional method. Thus, at least at the moment, this has the capacity to serve as an important adjunct in the teaching of ultrasonography. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/CGUPA at the OPENSCIENCE Framework.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, MedicalHumansLearningStudentsTeachingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36043680
PMCPMC9671565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.