Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043663›Full record

SynthesisSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina

Perceived racism or racial discrimination and the risk of adverse obstetric outcomes: a systematic review.

Glaucia Miranda Varella Pereira, Veronica Maria Pimentel, Fernanda Garanhani Surita, Amanda Dantas Silva, Luiz Gustavo Oliveira Brito

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Experience of Discrimination Impacts Technology Readiness and Psychosocial States of Minoritized Families Living With Type 1 Diabetes: Findings From the BEAD-T1D Pilot Study.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Glaucia Miranda Varella PereiraPT, MSc. Doctoral Candidate, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-5295
Veronica Maria PimentelMD, MSc. Attending Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center-Trinity Health of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, United States; Assistant Professor, Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, United States; and Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, University of Connecticut (UConn), Farmington, Connecticut, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-0620
Fernanda Garanhani SuritaMD, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4335-0337
Amanda Dantas SilvaMD. Attending Physician, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9258-0038
Luiz Gustavo Oliveira BritoMD, PhD. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas (SP), Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-4718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRacial disparities are differences among distinct subgroups of the human species; biologically, there are no scientifically proven reasons for them to exist.

objectiveTo assess the impact of racism or racial discrimination on obstetric outcomes. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review conducted at a tertiary/academic hospital.

methodsThe Cochrane Library, SCOPUS/EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from inception to June 2020. Studies presenting any type of racial discrimination, or any manifestation of racism that was perceived by women of any age in an obstetric scenario were included. Studies that only assessed racial disparities without including direct racism were excluded. The secondary outcomes evaluated included quality of antenatal care, intra and postpartum care, preterm birth and birthweight. The Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scale was used to assess the quality of evidence from non-randomized studies.

resultsA total of 508 records were retrieved and 29 were selected for qualitative synthesis. No meta-analysis could be performed due to the high heterogeneity across studies. Perceived racism was associated as a risk factor in 7/10 studies focusing on pregnancy and postpartum maternal outcomes, five studies on preterm birth, one study on small for gestational age and two studies on low birthweight. Overall, among the 29 studies, the risk of bias was classified as moderate.

conclusionsPerceived racism presented an association with poor obstetric outcomes. Anti-racist measures are needed in order to address the problems that are causing patients to perceive or experience racism. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO database, CRD42020194382.

Indexed as

Premature BirthRacismBirth WeightFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornPregnancyPrenatal Care

Identifiers

PMID36043663
PMCPMC9514866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.