ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022
Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning models for abstract screening task - A systematic literature review application for health economics and outcome research.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Pooled it
- Auditing frontier general-purpose large language models in biomedical tasks: reasoning gains, extraction limits, and benchmark reliability.Research square · 2026Article
- STInt: An integrated dataset covering science, technology and industry information in the pharmaceutical field.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Article
- Benchmarking large language models for biomedical natural language processing applications and recommendations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Computational tools and data integration to accelerate vaccine development: challenges, opportunities, and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Is metadata of articles about COVID-19 enough for multilabel topic classification task?Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Taiyi: a bilingual fine-tuned large language model for diverse biomedical tasks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Integrating deep learning architectures for enhanced biomedical relation extraction: a pipeline approach.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024Article
- Knowledge-Infused Prompting: Assessing and Advancing Clinical Text Data Generation with Large Language Models.Findings of ACL. ACL · 2024Article
- Transformer models in biomedicine.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Review
- Lessons learned to enable question answering on knowledge graphs extracted from scientific publications: A case study on the coronavirus literature.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Systematic Guidelines for Effective Utilization of COVID-19 Databases in Genomic, Epidemiologic, and Clinical Research.Viruses · 2023Review
- Classifying literature mentions of biological pathogens as experimentally studied using natural language processing.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2023Article
- Comprehensively identifying Long Covid articles with human-in-the-loop machine learning.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- LitCovid in 2022: an information resource for the COVID-19 literature.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Multi-class classification of COVID-19 documents using machine learning algorithms.Journal of intelligent information systems · 2023Article
- LitCovid ensemble learning for COVID-19 multi-label classification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
- A BERT-based ensemble learning approach for the BioCreative VII challenges: full-text chemical identification and multi-label classification in PubMed articles.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been severely impacting global society since December 2019. The related findings such as vaccine and drug development have been reported in biomedical literature-at a rate of about 10 000 articles on COVID-19 per month. Such rapid growth significantly challenges manual curation and interpretation. For instance, LitCovid is a literature database of COVID-19-related articles in PubMed, which has accumulated more than 200 000 articles with millions of accesses each month by users worldwide. One primary curation task is to assign up to eight topics (e.g. Diagnosis and Treatment) to the articles in LitCovid. The annotated topics have been widely used for navigating the COVID literature, rapidly locating articles of interest and other downstream studies. However, annotating the topics has been the bottleneck of manual curation. Despite the continuing advances in biomedical text-mining methods, few have been dedicated to topic annotations in COVID-19 literature. To close the gap, we organized the BioCreative LitCovid track to call for a community effort to tackle automated topic annotation for COVID-19 literature. The BioCreative LitCovid dataset-consisting of over 30 000 articles with manually reviewed topics-was created for training and testing. It is one of the largest multi-label classification datasets in biomedical scientific literature. Nineteen teams worldwide participated and made 80 submissions in total. Most teams used hybrid systems based on transformers. The highest performing submissions achieved 0.8875, 0.9181 and 0.9394 for macro-F1-score, micro-F1-score and instance-based F1-score, respectively. Notably, these scores are substantially higher (e.g. 12%, higher for macro F1-score) than the corresponding scores of the state-of-art multi-label classification method. The level of participation and results demonstrate a successful track and help close the gap between dataset curation and method development. The dataset is publicly available via https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/ for benchmarking and further development. Database URL https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.