Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043400›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2022

Multi-label classification for biomedical literature: an overview of the BioCreative VII LitCovid Track for COVID-19 literature topic annotations.

Qingyu Chen, Alexis Allot, Robert Leaman, Rezarta Islamaj, Jingcheng Du, Li Fang, Kai Wang, Shuo Xu, Yuefu Zhang, Parsa Bagherzadeh and 29 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Is metadata of articles about COVID-19 enough for multilabel topic classification task?Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  8. Taiyi: a bilingual fine-tuned large language model for diverse biomedical tasks.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transformer models in biomedicine.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. LitCovid ensemble learning for COVID-19 multi-label classification.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Qingyu ChenNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6036-1516
Alexis AllotNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-9054
Robert LeamanNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.
Rezarta IslamajNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.
Jingcheng DuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UT Health, TX, Houston 77030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0322-4566
Li FangRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5456-0255
Kai WangRaymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Shuo XuCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, QC, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8602-1819
Yuefu ZhangCollege of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, QC, China.
Parsa BagherzadehCLaC Labs, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Sabine BerglerCLaC Labs, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Aakash BhatnagarNavrachana University, Vadodara, India.
Nidhir BhavsarNavrachana University, Vadodara, India.
Yung-Chun ChangGraduate Institute of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9634-8380
Sheng-Jie LinGraduate Institute of Data Science, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wentai TangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Hongtong ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Ilija TavchioskiComputer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Senja PollakJožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Shubo TianDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6415-1439
Jinfeng ZhangDepartment of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7429-7615
Yulia OtmakhovaSchool of Computing and Information Systems, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AU-VIC, Australia.
Antonio Jimeno YepesSchool of Computing Technologies, RMIT University, Melbourne, AU-VIC, Australia.
Hang DongCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Honghan WuInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0213-5668
Richard DufourLS2N, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Yanis LabrakLIA, Avignon University, Avignon, France.
Niladri ChatterjeeDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Kushagri TandonDepartment of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Fréjus A A LaleyeOpscidia, Paris, France.
Loïc RakotosonOpscidia, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9420-8798
Emmanuele ChersoniDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jinghang GuDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Annemarie FriedrichBosch Center for Artificial Intelligence, Renningen, Germany.
Subhash Chandra PujariInstitute of Computer Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mariia ChizhikovaSINAI Group, Department of Computer Science, Advanced Studies Center in ICT (CEATIC), Universidad de Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Naveen SivadasanTCS Research, Life Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Saipradeep VgTCS Research, Life Sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, MD, Bethesda 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9998-916X

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_18029Medical Research Council MR/S004149/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been severely impacting global society since December 2019. The related findings such as vaccine and drug development have been reported in biomedical literature-at a rate of about 10 000 articles on COVID-19 per month. Such rapid growth significantly challenges manual curation and interpretation. For instance, LitCovid is a literature database of COVID-19-related articles in PubMed, which has accumulated more than 200 000 articles with millions of accesses each month by users worldwide. One primary curation task is to assign up to eight topics (e.g. Diagnosis and Treatment) to the articles in LitCovid. The annotated topics have been widely used for navigating the COVID literature, rapidly locating articles of interest and other downstream studies. However, annotating the topics has been the bottleneck of manual curation. Despite the continuing advances in biomedical text-mining methods, few have been dedicated to topic annotations in COVID-19 literature. To close the gap, we organized the BioCreative LitCovid track to call for a community effort to tackle automated topic annotation for COVID-19 literature. The BioCreative LitCovid dataset-consisting of over 30 000 articles with manually reviewed topics-was created for training and testing. It is one of the largest multi-label classification datasets in biomedical scientific literature. Nineteen teams worldwide participated and made 80 submissions in total. Most teams used hybrid systems based on transformers. The highest performing submissions achieved 0.8875, 0.9181 and 0.9394 for macro-F1-score, micro-F1-score and instance-based F1-score, respectively. Notably, these scores are substantially higher (e.g. 12%, higher for macro F1-score) than the corresponding scores of the state-of-art multi-label classification method. The level of participation and results demonstrate a successful track and help close the gap between dataset curation and method development. The dataset is publicly available via https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/ for benchmarking and further development. Database URL https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/lu/LitCovid/biocreative/.

Indexed as

COVID-19Databases, FactualData MiningHumansPublicationsPubMed

Identifiers

PMID36043400
PMCPMC9428574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.