Observational studyAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023
Impact of vaping restrictions in public places on smoking and vaping in the United States-evidence using a difference-in-differences approach.
Observational study in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations Between County-Level Vape-Free Air Law Coverage and E-Cigarette Use Behaviors Among U.S. Adolescents in Monitoring the Future.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2026Article
- Behavioral responses to smoking bans in local public places in China: A secondary dataset analysis of China Family Panel Studies, 2010-2020.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitude, practice and policy support of college students toward electronic cigarette use: a nationwide multicentric study in Iran.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Coverage of Indoor Smoking and Vaping Restrictions in the U.S., 1990-2021.American journal of preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Comprehensive vaping bans are associated with lower odds of initiation into electronic nicotine delivery systems use among young people.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- Patterns, clusters, and transitions in U.S. state ENDS policy implementation: 2010-2020.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo estimate whether and to what extent extending indoor smoking restrictions to include electronic cigarettes (ECs) impact the use of ECs and cigarette smoking among adults in the United States.
designObservational study using a linear probability model and applying a difference-in-differences analysis.
settingUnited States.
participantsPeople aged 18-54 who lived in US counties where comprehensive indoor smoking laws in bars, restaurants and private work-places have been in place prior to 2010 (n = 45 111 for EC use analysis, n = 75 959 for cigarette use analysis). MEASUREMENTS: Data on cigarette smoking, use of ECs and place of residence from the Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey (TUS-CPS 2010-11, 2014-15 and 2018-19) were combined with the American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation (ANRF) database of state and local indoor smoking and vaping restriction laws.
findingsIndoor vaping restriction (IVR) coverage was not significantly associated with the likelihood of adult EC use [coefficient estimate = 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.009, 0.013, P-value = 0.783]. In addition, IVR coverage was not significantly associated with adult cigarette smoking (coefficient estimate = -0.00; 95% CI = -0.016, 0.015, P-value = 0.954). The non-significant results appeared in different socio-demographic subgroups.
conclusionsIVRs do not appear to decrease electronic cigarette use among US adults. There is no evidence that IVRs increase or decrease cigarette smoking among US adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.