Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043341›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2022

Sparse kernel models provide optimization of training set design for genomic prediction in multiyear wheat breeding data.

Marco Lopez-Cruz, Susanne Dreisigacker, Leonardo Crespo-Herrera, Alison R Bentley, Ravi Singh, Jesse Poland, Sandesh Shrestha, Julio Huerta-Espino, Velu Govindan, Philomin Juliana and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marco Lopez-CruzDep. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2548-1766
Susanne DreisigackerGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-5989
Leonardo Crespo-HerreraGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Alison R BentleyGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-4357
Ravi SinghGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Jesse PolandDep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7856-1399
Sandesh ShresthaDep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS, USA.
Julio Huerta-EspinoCampo Experimental Valle de Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Chapingo, Mexico.
Velu GovindanGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Philomin JulianaGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Suchismita MondalGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Mexico.
Jose CrossaGlobal Wheat Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of genomic selection (GS) in breeding schemes relies on its ability to provide accurate predictions of unobserved lines at early stages. Multigeneration data provides opportunities to increase the training data size and thus, the likelihood of extracting useful information from ancestors to improve prediction accuracy. The genomic best linear unbiased predictions (GBLUPs) are performed by borrowing information through kinship relationships between individuals. Multigeneration data usually becomes heterogeneous with complex family relationship patterns that are increasingly entangled with each generation. Under these conditions, historical data may not be optimal for model training as the accuracy could be compromised. The sparse selection index (SSI) is a method for training set (TRN) optimization, in which training individuals provide predictions to some but not all predicted subjects. We added an additional trimming process to the original SSI (trimmed SSI) to remove less important training individuals for prediction. Using a large multigeneration (8 yr) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain yield dataset (n = 68,836), we found increases in accuracy as more years are included in the TRN, with improvements of ∼0.05 in the GBLUP accuracy when using 5 yr of historical data relative to when using only 1 yr. The SSI method showed a small gain over the GBLUP accuracy but with an important reduction on the TRN size. These reduced TRNs were formed with a similar number of subjects from each training generation. Our results suggest that the SSI provides a more stable ranking of genotypes than the GBLUP as the TRN becomes larger.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingTriticumGenomeGenomicsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID36043341
PMCPMC12806882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.