Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043278›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

A central place foraging seabird flies at right angles to the wind to jointly optimize locomotor and olfactory search efficiency.

Francesco Ventura, Paulo Catry, Maria P Dias, Greg A Breed, Arnau Folch, José Pedro Granadeiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Albatrosses employ orientation and routing strategies similar to yacht racers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Albatrosses orient toward infrasound while foraging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco VenturaCESAM, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1584-2433
Paulo CatryMARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Ispa-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria P DiasCentre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (cE3c), Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Greg A BreedInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK, USA.
Arnau FolchGeociencias Barcelona-Consejo Superior Investigaciones Cientificas (GEO3BCN-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain.
José Pedro GranadeiroCESAM, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-7207-3474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To increase the probability of detecting odour plumes, and so increase prey capture success, when winds are stable central place foraging seabirds should fly crosswind to maximize the round-trip distance covered. At present, however, there is no empirical evidence of this theoretical prediction. Here, using an extensive GPS tracking dataset, we investigate, for the first time, the foraging movements of Bulwer's petrels (

Indexed as

BirdsFeeding BehaviorAnimalsCuesSmellWindBulwer's petrelcentral place foragingflight behaviourolfactionwindzig-zag

Identifiers

PMID36043278
PMCPMC9428525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.