Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36043201›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Podcasts: Current Status.

Ricardo Hernandez, Yaron Ivan, Eva Esperanza, Andrew Little

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo HernandezEmergency Medicine, AdventHealth East Orlando, Orlando, USA.
Yaron IvanPediatric Emergency Medicine, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA.
Eva EsperanzaEmergency Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA.
Andrew LittleEmergency Medicine, AdventHealth East Orlando, Orlando, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPodcasting has become a primary delivery model for medical content among various specialties. Although this model is still growing, it has become an essential tool for many learners, educators, and institutions. Because of this rapid growth, there is an unknown availability of podcasts for each specialty.

objectivesThis paper aimed to evaluate the podcasts currently available in the subspecialty of pediatric emergency medicine (PEM).

methodsThe investigators sought to evaluate the prevalence of PEM podcasts from the end-user's (medical students, residents, etc.) perspective. This was completed by performing a simple internet search using the term "podcasts in pediatric emergency medicine." Using Google Search, the first 50 results were analyzed.

resultsFor PEM, there were only eight podcasts found, five of which were active.

conclusionPEM podcasts in comparison to other specialties are currently underrepresented and lacking in this important resource. The authors call on PEM physicians, educators, and organizations to consider creating content in this educational space.

Indexed as

emergency medicineemergency medicine residentemergency medicine trainingpediatric emergency medicinepediatric emergency medicine podcastspediatricspodcasts

Identifiers

PMID36043201
PMCPMC9411709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.