Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042988›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

An Analytical Comparison Between Ketamine Alone and a Combination of Ketamine and Propofol (Ketofol) for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia From an Emergency Perspective: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hany A Zaki, Nabil Shallik, Eman Shaban, Khalid Bashir, Haris Iftikhar, Yousra Mohamed Khair, Mohammed Gafar Abdelrahim, Mohamed Fayed, Mohamed Hendy, Emad El-Din Salem and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Hany A ZakiEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Nabil ShallikClinical Anesthesia, Weill Cornell Medical College - Qatar, Doha, QAT.
Eman ShabanCardiology, Al Jufairi Diagnostic and Treatment, Doha, QAT.
Khalid BashirMedicine, Qatar University, Doha, QAT.
Haris IftikharEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Yousra Mohamed KhairMedical Education and Simulation, Weill Cornell Medical College - Qatar, Doha, QAT.
Mohammed Gafar AbdelrahimEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Mohamed FayedEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Mohamed HendyAccident and Emergency, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Emad El-Din SalemAnesthesia, Armed Forces Hospitals, Cairo, EGY.
Amr ElmoheenEmergency Medicine, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, QAT.
Hamad Medical Corporation · QAArmed Forces College of Medicine · EGWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QAArmed Forces Hospital · SAKing Fahad Hospital Hufūf · SAQatar University · QATanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is a treatment approach involving treating patients with agents with dissociative, sedative, or analgesic properties to suppress their consciousness to variable levels. Ketamine and propofol have been used historically for PSA. Because they each have their demerits, it was postulated that combining both drugs (ketofol) would result in a mixture with additive properties and lessen or eliminate the demerits attributed to each drug. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare ketamine alone and a combination of ketamine and propofol (ketofol) for procedural sedation and analgesia from an emergency perspective. A systematic search was conducted on published studies from the databases of Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar, APA PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial (CENTRAL) until July 2022. The articles that were published on the online databases were authored between January 2007 and 2018. The selected papers were scanned and examined to check whether they met the eligibility criteria for the study. The search produced six articles that were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. All six articles that passed the eligibility criteria were viable for the analysis. All the trials focused on the effectiveness of ketofol versus ketamine for PSA from an emergency perspective. Ketofol was found to be safe and more effective in comparison to ketamine for PTA.

Indexed as

emergency medicineketamineketofolmeta-analysisprocedural sedation and analgesiapropofolsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36042988
PMCPMC9411697
OpenAlexW4288040799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.