Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042985›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Outcomes of Road Traffic Accidents Before and After the Implementation of a Seat Belt Detection System: A Comparative Retrospective Study in Riyadh.

Ibrahim Al Babtain, Aljawharah Alabdulkarim, Ghadah Alquwaiee, Shikah Alsuwaid, Eythar Alrushid, Maram Albalawi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ibrahim Al BabtainGeneral Surgery, King Abdulaziz Medical City Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU.
Aljawharah AlabdulkarimMedicine and Surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Ghadah AlquwaieeMedicine and Surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Shikah AlsuwaidMedicine and Surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Eythar AlrushidMedicine and Surgery, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Riyadh, SAU.
Maram AlbalawiBiostatistics, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, SAU.
King Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Road traffic accidents (RTAs) are considered a major cause of death in Saudi Arabia. As seat belt compliance provides significant safety among drivers, a camera detection system has been implemented in March 2018 to enforce seat belt utilization, which can decrease the severity of road traffic injuries. There are no previous studies in the country that have assessed the effectiveness of a seat belt camera detection system on the severity of RTA-related injuries. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical Trauma Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included 688 adult patients who were involved in RTAs from the period of March 2016 to March 2020. A data extraction form included sociodemographics, clinical variables, and outcome measures. The data were analyzed using Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) to evaluate the primary outcome measures: mortality, ejection from the vehicle, ICU admissions, and severity measures (injury severity score (ISS) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)) before and after the implementation of seat belt detection system. Associations of the outcome measures in the pre-implementation and the post-implementation periods' seat belt detection were assessed using regression tests. Results There was no significant difference in the mean age between the pre-implementation and post-implementation periods of the seat belt detection system (31.39 years and 32.57 years, respectively). All of the outcome measures have improved following the implementation of the seat belt detection system. Mortality and ejection rates decreased significantly with 58% lower risk of death (OR= 0.42; 95% CI= 0.2,0.8) and 37% lower risk of ejection (OR= 0.63; 95% CI= 0.42,0.94). ICU admissions showed a slight decline in the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (30.37% vs. 31.37, p<0.7764). Severity measures (ISS and GCS) were slightly improved in the post-implementation period. Head and neck injuries were dominant in the pre-implementation period, and chest injuries were the most common body injuries after the implementation. Conclusion This study highlights the direct association between compliance with seat belt use and the primary outcome measures among patients who survived a road traffic accident. All of the outcome measures showed improvement in the post-implementation period, which indicates the effectiveness of the newly implemented seat belt detection system. These findings raise awareness to the public in regard to seat belt compliance.

Indexed as

detection systemejectiongcsicuissmortalityroad traffic accidentsseatbelttrauma

Identifiers

PMID36042985
PMCPMC9407678
OpenAlexW4288037067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.