Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in sleep2022

A Nationally Representative Survey Assessing Restorative Sleep in US Adults.

Rebecca Robbins, Stuart F Quan, Daniel Buysse, Matthew D Weaver, Matthew P Walker, Christopher L Drake, Kristen Monten, Laura K Barger, Shantha M W Rajaratnam, Thomas Roth and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in sleep, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A randomized pilot study of a wearable device using variable complex weak magnetic fields among participants with insomnia symptoms.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebecca RobbinsDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0288-2505
Stuart F QuanDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-7679
Daniel BuysseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3288-1864
Matthew D WeaverDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3578-336X
Matthew P WalkerCenter for Human Sleep Science, Department of Psychology, University of California; Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7839-6389
Christopher L DrakeSleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5486-3587
Kristen MontenMiddlebury College; Middlebury, VT, USA.
Laura K BargerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-7331
Shantha M W RajaratnamDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7527-8558
Thomas RothSleep Disorders and Research Center, Henry Ford Hospital; Detroit, MI, USA.
Charles A CzeislerDivision of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-1849
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCircadian (United States) · USHarvard University · USMiddlebury College · USHenry Ford Hospital · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Improving the Health of EMS professionals through Sleep Health Education and Sleep Disorder ScreeningR56HL151637 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI WEAVER, MATTHEW DAVID · 2020 to 2020
$793k
An mHealth intervention to deliver personalized messages to increase adherence to OSA evaluation and treatment among transportation workersK01HL150339 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ROBBINS, REBECCA · 2020 to 2024
$708k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL150339NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL151637NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restorative sleep is a commonly used term but a poorly defined construct. Few studies have assessed restorative sleep in nationally representative samples. We convened a panel of 7 expert physicians and researchers to evaluate and enhance available measures of restorative sleep. We then developed the revised Restorative Sleep Questionnaire (REST-Q), which comprises 9 items assessing feelings resulting from the prior sleep episode, each with 5-point Likert response scales. Finally, we assessed the prevalence of high, somewhat, and low REST-Q scores in a nationally representative sample of US adults (n= 1,055) and examined the relationship of REST-Q scores with other sleep and demographic characteristics. Pairwise correlations were performed between the REST-Q scores and other self-reported sleep measures. Weighted logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare scores on the REST-Q with demographic variables. The prevalence of higher REST-Q scores (4 or 5 on the Likert scale) was 28.1% in the nationally representative sample. REST-Q scores positively correlated with sleep quality (r=0.61) and sleep duration (r=0.32), and negatively correlated with both difficulty falling asleep (r=-0.40) and falling back asleep after waking (r=-0.41). Higher restorative sleep scores (indicating more feelings of restoration upon waking) were more common among those who were: ≥60 years of age (OR=4.20, 95%CI: 1.92-9.17); widowed (OR=2.35, 95%CI:1.01-5.42), and retired (OR=2.02, 95%CI:1.30-3.14). Higher restorative sleep scores were less frequent among those who were not working (OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.00) and living in a household with two or more persons (OR=0.51,95%CI:0.29-0.87). Our findings suggest that the REST-Q may be useful for assessing restorative sleep.

Indexed as

national sampleRestorative sleepsleepsleep health

Identifiers

PMID36042946
PMCPMC9423762
OpenAlexW4286492727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.