Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36042913›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments.

Majid Moshirfar, Marshall K Henrie, Carter J Payne, Briana K Ply, Yasmyne C Ronquillo, Steven H Linn, Phillip C Hoopes

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical interventions for presbyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Majid MoshirfarHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Marshall K HenrieUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2029-323X
Carter J PayneCase Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Briana K PlyHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.
Yasmyne C RonquilloHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-4380
Steven H LinnHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7931-4341
Phillip C HoopesHDR Research Center, Hoopes Vision, Draper, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2567-8331
Hoopes Vision · USUniversity of Utah · USUniversity School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presbyopia may represent the largest segment of refractive errors that is without an established and effective refractive surgery treatment. Corneal Inlays are materials (synthetic or allogenic) implanted in the stroma of patients' corneas to improve presbyopia. These inlays, introduced into the United States in 2015 via the small-aperture corneal inlay (KAMRA

Indexed as

corneal allograftscorneal inlaycorneal onlayflexivueKAMRAPEARLPresbyLASIKpresbyopic allogenic refractive lenticuleraindroprefractive surgerySMILE

Identifiers

PMID36042913
PMCPMC9420445
OpenAlexW4293168953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.