ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2022
FOCUS-PDCA can effectively optimize the critical value of test items: FOCUS-PDCA može efikasno da optimizuje kritičnu vrednost ispitivanja.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effect of Plan Do Check Act cycle management mode on patients with severe pneumonia complicated with respiratory failure: A retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- The Preventive Effect of the FOCUS-PDCA Management Mode on Deep Vein Thrombosis in Elderly Patients Following Orthopedic Surgery.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2025Article
- Optimizing Laboratory Processes: A Path to Reduced Sample Rejection in Oncology.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Article
- Referral Process Enhancement: Innovative Approaches and Best Practices.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To optimize the critical value of test items using FOCUS-PDCA (find, organize, clarify, understand, select, plan, do, check and act), and to set the personalized critical value of the test for different departments. Methods: We searched for literature reporting on the critical value and FOCUS-PDCA published over recent 5 years in order to understand the significance and status quo of critical value and FOCUS-PDCA. We also collected and analyzed the critical value data of hospital tests performed in Sichuan province hospitals in 2019, which were later compared to data from 2020 to determine the FOCUSPDCA cycle. Results: The proportion of critical values in the whole hospital decreased from 3.5% before optimization to 2.5% to 3% after optimization. The critical values of ICU, hematology, nephrology, urology, and neonatal departments after optimization significantly decreased compared with those before optimization, while the critical values of cardiac surgery, emergency ICU, cardiology, and neurosurgery ICU showed no significant difference before and after optimization. Contrary, the critical values of the infection department after optimization significantly increased before optimization. Conclusions: FOCUS-PDCA can effectively optimize the critical value of test items, which is beneficial for rational utilization of medical resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.